public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/43920] Choosing conditional execution over conditional branches for code size in some cases.
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 06:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-43920-4-GVh3qP9U19@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-43920-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920

--- Comment #15 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-19 06:17:54 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Mon Sep 19 06:17:45 2011
New Revision: 178953

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178953
Log:
2011-09-19  chengbin  <bin.cheng@arm.com>

    Backport r174035 from mainline
    2011-05-22  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

    PR middle-end/48689
    * fold-const.c (fold_checksum_tree): Guard TREE_CHAIN use with
    CODE_CONTAINS_STRUCT (TS_COMMON).

    Backport r172297 from mainline
    2011-04-11  Chung-Lin Tang  <cltang@codesourcery.com>
        Richard Earnshaw  <rearnsha@arm.com>

    PR target/48250
    * config/arm/arm.c (arm_legitimize_reload_address): Update cases
    to use sign-magnitude offsets. Reject unsupported unaligned
    cases. Add detailed description in comments.
    * config/arm/arm.md (reload_outdf): Disable for ARM mode; change
    condition from TARGET_32BIT to TARGET_ARM.

    Backport r171978 from mainline
    2011-04-05  Tom de Vries  <tom@codesourcery.com>

    PR target/43920
    * config/arm/arm.h (BRANCH_COST): Set to 1 for Thumb-2 when optimizing
    for size.

    Backport r171632 from mainline
    2011-03-28  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>

    * builtins.c (expand_builtin_memset_args): Use gen_int_mode
    instead of GEN_INT.

    Backport r171379 from mainline
    2011-03-23  Chung-Lin Tang  <cltang@codesourcery.com>

    PR target/46934
    * config/arm/arm.md (casesi): Use the gen_int_mode() function
    to subtract lower bound instead of GEN_INT().

    Backport r171251 from mainline 
    2011-03-21  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>

    * config/arm/unwind-arm.c (__gnu_unwind_pr_common): Correct test
    for barrier handlers.

    Backport r171096 from mainline
    2011-03-17  Chung-Lin Tang  <cltang@codesourcery.com>

    PR target/43872
    * config/arm/arm.c (arm_get_frame_offsets): Adjust early
    return condition with !cfun->calls_alloca.


Modified:
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/ChangeLog.arm
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/builtins.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.h
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/unwind-arm.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/fold-const.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr40887.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr42575.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43698.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr44788.c
    branches/ARM/embedded-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/sync-1.c


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-19  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-43920-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-04-05 10:05 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-05 10:13 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-05 10:34 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-05 13:02 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-06  9:41 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-07  8:10 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-07  8:35 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-07  9:28 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-07  9:48 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-11 16:38 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-19  6:21 ` jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2010-04-28  8:18 [Bug target/43920] New: A lot of instructions for condition (start == -1 || end == -1) carrot at google dot com
2010-04-28  9:55 ` [Bug target/43920] Choosing conditional execution over conditional branches for code size in some cases ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-29  2:24 ` carrot at google dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-43920-4-GVh3qP9U19@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).