public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/44020] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K
@ 2010-05-07 4:07 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 4:58 ` [Bug middle-end/44020] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-05-07 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
On Linux/x86-64, revision 159144 gave:
[hjl@gnu-28 00000001]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/usr/bin/gfortran -c -o
umlau6.o -DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O2 -ffast-math -O3 -ffast-math
-funroll-loops umlau6.f
umlau6.f: In function \u2018umlau6\u2019:
umlau6.f:3:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[hjl@gnu-28 00000001]$
Revision 159105 is OK.
--
Summary: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC
CPU 2K
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44020
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44020] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K
2010-05-07 4:07 [Bug middle-end/44020] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-05-07 4:58 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 5:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-05-07 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-07 04:57 -------
#0 0x0000000000b6babf in bmp_iter_set_init (bi=0x7fffffffdda0, map=0x0,
start_bit=0, bit_no=0x7fffffffddcc) at ../../src/gcc/bitmap.h:227
#1 0x0000000000b79d6e in remove_dead_inserted_code ()
at ../../src/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4448
#2 0x0000000000b7a9f8 in execute_pre (do_fre=0 '\000')
at ../../src/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4714
#3 0x0000000000b7ac10 in do_pre () at ../../src/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4782
#4 0x0000000000918ce2 in execute_one_pass (pass=0x171a1a0)
at ../../src/gcc/passes.c:1590
#5 0x0000000000918ed6 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x171a1a0)
at ../../src/gcc/passes.c:1645
#6 0x0000000000918ef7 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x1718e80)
at ../../src/gcc/passes.c:1646
#7 0x0000000000a96245 in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x7ffff7fab400)
at ../../src/gcc/tree-optimize.c:413
#8 0x0000000000cfe60a in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x7ffff7ec1540)
at ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1627
#9 0x0000000000cfe8a2 in cgraph_expand_all_functions ()
at ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1706
#10 0x0000000000cfef03 in cgraph_optimize () at ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1954
#11 0x0000000000cfc98f in cgraph_finalize_compilation_unit ()
at ../../src/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1166
#12 0x00000000008b89f1 in write_global_declarations ()
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44020
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44020] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K
2010-05-07 4:07 [Bug middle-end/44020] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 4:58 ` [Bug middle-end/44020] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-05-07 5:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-05-07 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-07 05:16 -------
It is caused by revision 159106:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05/msg00156.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44020
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44020] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K
2010-05-07 4:07 [Bug middle-end/44020] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 4:58 ` [Bug middle-end/44020] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 5:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-05-07 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-07 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 09:40 -------
I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-05-07 09:40:01
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44020
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44020] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K
2010-05-07 4:07 [Bug middle-end/44020] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-07 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 11:55 -------
Subject: Bug 44020
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 7 11:55:21 2010
New Revision: 159150
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159150
Log:
2010-05-07 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/44020
* tree-ssa-pre.c (execute_pre): Do not remove dead inserted
code when PRE is not yet initialized.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44020
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/44020] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K
2010-05-07 4:07 [Bug middle-end/44020] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-07 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-07 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-07 11:55 -------
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44020
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-07 11:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-07 4:07 [Bug middle-end/44020] New: [4.6 regression] Failed to build 200.sixtrack in SPEC CPU 2K hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 4:58 ` [Bug middle-end/44020] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 5:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-05-07 9:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-07 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).