From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-350859-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12589 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2011 06:46:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 12577 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Mar 2011 06:46:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:46:37 +0000
From: "Denis.Excoffier at airbus dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/44107] libstdc++ (dylib) is built with an erroneous dependency towards /usr/lib
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Denis.Excoffier at airbus dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.1
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-44107-4-xEPEueH08X@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44107-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44107-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:18:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg02172.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44107

--- Comment #13 from Denis Excoffier <Denis.Excoffier at airbus dot com> 2011-03-21 06:46:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > (In reply to comment #10)
> > > (In reply to comment #8)
> > So, my question is "does version 'x' work without a DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH set?"
> > (that tells us if we have a way forward)
> duh ... make that version 'y'.
If you take the pure distribution gcc-4.6.0-RC-20110314 and apply the two
patches (the patch attached in #4 and included in #5), then
- you can bootstrap without error (i can say for C and C++ for the time
  being)
- the xerces-c library compiles ok
- my C++ program compiles ok
- my C++ program executes ok with no DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH needed
- all the dylibs and executable around carry a dependency towards
  /usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib