From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-345181-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10218 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2011 13:05:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 10203 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2011 13:05:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:05:12 +0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/44174] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] can't find a register in class 'CLOBBERED_REGS' while reloading 'asm'
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.4.6
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-44174-4-4syfIKw6Pn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44174-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44174-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:53:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg03120.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174

--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-01-28 13:04:36 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-28 12:45:43 UTC ---
>> You're right: I somehow misread the PR and though the test had already
>> been introduced in november last year.
>
> It did pass with GCC 4.3 on Solaris too so this is a regression.  Can you XFAIL
> it on Solaris for the time being?

Sure.  The following patch does this:

2011-01-28  Rainer Orth  <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

    * gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c: XFAIL on i?86-pc-solaris2.1[0-9] && ilp32.

diff -r a1670fd752ff gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c    Thu Jan 27 20:26:26 2011 +0100
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/asm-6.c    Fri Jan 28 14:03:13 2011 +0100
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@

 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -fpic" { target fpic } } */
+/* { dg-xfail-if "" { i?86-pc-solaris2.1[0-9] && ilp32 } } */

 int f0 (int, int, int, int, int);
 int f1 (void);

Ok for mainline (I'll post to gcc-patches anyway)?

    Rainer