public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/44412] New: Another bogus set-but-not-used warning
@ 2010-06-04 0:35 paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-06-04 12:04 ` [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-06-04 0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
This one causes tons of warnings in the libstdc++ testsuite (with -Wall in
CXXFLAGS) and seems also bogus to me.
struct ratio
{
static const int a = 3;
};
const int ratio::a;
int f()
{
ratio r;
return r.a;
}
--
Summary: Another bogus set-but-not-used warning
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] Another bogus set-but-not-used warning
2010-06-04 0:35 [Bug c++/44412] New: Another bogus set-but-not-used warning paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-06-04 12:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-04 14:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-04 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 12:03 -------
More complete testcase:
// PR c++/44412
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-Wunused" }
struct S
{
static const int a = 3;
static int b;
int c;
};
const int S::a;
int S::b = 4;
int
f1 ()
{
S s;
return s.a;
}
int
f2 ()
{
S s;
return s.b;
}
void
f3 ()
{
S s;
s.c = 6;// { dg-warning "set but not used" }
}
int
f4 ()
{
S s;
s.c = 6;
return s.c;
}
Guess we should mark the object through which a static data member is accessed,
because that access already marks the object as TREE_USED, yet it is not a set
of the object. Not sure where to do that though. Calling methods or static
methods apparently is handled already, in both cases build_new_method_call
-> build_this -> cp_build_unary_op ADDR_EXPR -> mark_lvalue_use ->
mark_exp_read takes care of it:
// PR c++/44412
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-Wunused" }
struct S
{
int foo ();
static int bar ();
};
int S::foo ()
{
return 5;
}
int S::bar ()
{
return 6;
}
int
f1 ()
{
S s;
return s.foo ();
}
int
f2 ()
{
S s;
return s.bar ();
}
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org, jason at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Summary|Another bogus set-but-not- |[4.6 Regression] Another
|used warning |bogus set-but-not-used
| |warning
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] Another bogus set-but-not-used warning
2010-06-04 0:35 [Bug c++/44412] New: Another bogus set-but-not-used warning paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-06-04 12:04 ` [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-04 14:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-04 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 11:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-04 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 14:12 -------
Created an attachment (id=20838)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20838&action=view)
gcc46-pr44412.patch
Untested patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] Another bogus set-but-not-used warning
2010-06-04 0:35 [Bug c++/44412] New: Another bogus set-but-not-used warning paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-06-04 12:04 ` [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-04 14:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-04 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 11:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-04 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 18:46 -------
Subject: Bug 44412
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 4 18:45:07 2010
New Revision: 160290
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160290
Log:
PR c++/44412
* typeck.c (build_class_member_access_expr): Call mark_exp_read
on object for static data members.
* g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-10.C: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-11.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-10.C
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-11.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] Another bogus set-but-not-used warning
2010-06-04 0:35 [Bug c++/44412] New: Another bogus set-but-not-used warning paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-04 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 11:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 11:00 -------
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44412
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-24 11:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-04 0:35 [Bug c++/44412] New: Another bogus set-but-not-used warning paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2010-06-04 12:04 ` [Bug c++/44412] [4.6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-04 14:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-04 18:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 11:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).