public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/44497]  New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
@ 2010-06-10 22:05 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-06-10 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/44497] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-10 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

On Linux/ia32, revision 160551 gave

FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90  -O1  (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90  -O1  (test for excess errors)

Revision 160538 is OK


-- 
           Summary: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44497


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/44497] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
  2010-06-10 22:05 [Bug fortran/44497] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-10 22:37 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-10 23:02 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-10 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-10 22:37 -------
This is a context free PR.  Please provide details.


-- 

kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
            Summary|[4.6 Regression]            |[4.6 Regression]
                   |gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90 |gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44497


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/44497] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
  2010-06-10 22:05 [Bug fortran/44497] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-06-10 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/44497] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-10 23:02 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-10 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 709 bytes --]



------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-06-10 23:02 -------
I got

[hjl@gnu-29 testsuite]$ ../gfortran -B../ -S
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
 -O1
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90:
In function ‘main’:
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/src-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90:155:0:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[hjl@gnu-29 testsuite]$ 

It could be a dup of PR 44498.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44497


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/44497] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
  2010-06-10 22:05 [Bug fortran/44497] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-06-10 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/44497] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-10 23:02 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-11 12:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-11 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44497


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/44497] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
  2010-06-10 22:05 [Bug fortran/44497] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-11 12:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-11 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-11 12:43 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> It could be a dup of PR 44498.

It if does not turn out to be a dup of the bitmap work / PR 44498, we need a
backtrace or valgrind trace (with minimal options, e.g. -O0 if possible).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44497


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/44497] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90
  2010-06-10 22:05 [Bug fortran/44497] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-06-11 12:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-12 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2010-06-12 15:21 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 44498 ***


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44497


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-12 15:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-10 22:05 [Bug fortran/44497] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/maxlocval_2.f90 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:37 ` [Bug fortran/44497] " kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-10 23:02 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-11 12:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).