public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
@ 2010-06-10 22:06 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:41 ` [Bug libgomp/44498] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-10 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
On Linux/Intel64, 160556 gave
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/lock-1.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/lock-1.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O2 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O2 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler
error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (internal compiler
error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
(internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops (test
for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops (test
for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -Os (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -Os (internal compiler error)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -Os (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/task1.f90 -Os (test for excess errors)
Revision 160505 is OK.
--
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-10 22:41 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-10 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-10 22:40 -------
It is caused by revision 160549:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-06/msg00464.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:41 ` [Bug libgomp/44498] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-10 22:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-10 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-10 22:42 -------
The error looks like:
/export/gnu/import/rrs/160549/src/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/task1.f90:
In function 'MAIN__._omp_fn.1':^M
/export/gnu/import/rrs/160549/src/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/task1.f90:11:0:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault^M
Please submit a full bug report,^M
with preprocessed source if appropriate.^M
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.^M
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:41 ` [Bug libgomp/44498] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-10 22:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 23:20 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-10 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7678 bytes --]
------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-10 22:54 -------
mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to compile:
/export/gnu/import/rrs/160549/usr/bin/gcc -S -DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O2
-ffast-math -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops vbfill.c
gnu-32:pts/5[189]> /export/gnu/import/rrs/160549/usr/bin/gcc -S
-DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O2 -ffast-math -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops
vbfill.c
gnu-32:pts/5[189]> /export/gnu/import/rrs/160549/usr/bin/gcc -S
-DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O2 -ffast-math -O3 -ffast-math -funroll-loops
vbfill.c
vbfill.c: In function ‘vertex3fv_color_tex2’:
vbfill.c:893:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Valgrind reports:
Compiler executable checksum: 4c54e42d5bc4c23dc94f31d87d27f3e6
==23693== Invalid read of size 8
==23693== at 0x59F7EE: bitmap_clear (bitmap.c:298)
==23693== by 0x59FB60: bitmap_obstack_free (bitmap.c:394)
==23693== by 0x65F98E: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1649)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693== by 0xD1015E: cgraph_finalize_compilation_unit (cgraphunit.c:1171)
==23693== Address 0xb8b6280 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 4,064 free'd
==23693== at 0x4A04D72: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325)
==23693== by 0x32BF67E3A4: obstack_free (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==23693== by 0x59F958: bitmap_obstack_release (bitmap.c:345)
==23693== by 0x65F973: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1646)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693==
==23693== Invalid read of size 8
==23693== at 0x59FB65: bitmap_obstack_free (bitmap.c:395)
==23693== by 0x65F98E: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1649)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693== by 0xD1015E: cgraph_finalize_compilation_unit (cgraphunit.c:1171)
==23693== by 0x4B213B: c_write_global_declarations (c-decl.c:9703)
==23693== Address 0xb8b6298 is 40 bytes inside a block of size 4,064 free'd
==23693== at 0x4A04D72: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325)
==23693== by 0x32BF67E3A4: obstack_free (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==23693== by 0x59F958: bitmap_obstack_release (bitmap.c:345)
==23693== by 0x65F973: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1646)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693==
==23693== Invalid write of size 8
==23693== at 0x59FB74: bitmap_obstack_free (bitmap.c:395)
==23693== by 0x65F98E: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1649)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693== by 0xD1015E: cgraph_finalize_compilation_unit (cgraphunit.c:1171)
==23693== by 0x4B213B: c_write_global_declarations (c-decl.c:9703)
==23693== Address 0xb8b6280 is 16 bytes inside a block of size 4,064 free'd
==23693== at 0x4A04D72: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325)
==23693== by 0x32BF67E3A4: obstack_free (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==23693== by 0x59F958: bitmap_obstack_release (bitmap.c:345)
==23693== by 0x65F973: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1646)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693==
==23693== Invalid read of size 8
==23693== at 0x59FB7B: bitmap_obstack_free (bitmap.c:399)
==23693== by 0x65F98E: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1649)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693== by 0xD1015E: cgraph_finalize_compilation_unit (cgraphunit.c:1171)
==23693== by 0x4B213B: c_write_global_declarations (c-decl.c:9703)
==23693== Address 0xb8b6298 is 40 bytes inside a block of size 4,064 free'd
==23693== at 0x4A04D72: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:325)
==23693== by 0x32BF67E3A4: obstack_free (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==23693== by 0x59F958: bitmap_obstack_release (bitmap.c:345)
==23693== by 0x65F973: df_live_free (df-problems.c:1646)
==23693== by 0x658A26: rest_of_handle_df_finish (df-core.c:813)
==23693== by 0x900535: execute_one_pass (passes.c:1576)
==23693== by 0x90071E: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1631)
==23693== by 0x90073F: execute_pass_list (passes.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xA8D347: tree_rest_of_compilation (tree-optimize.c:420)
==23693== by 0xD11E81: cgraph_expand_function (cgraphunit.c:1632)
==23693== by 0xD12145: cgraph_expand_all_functions (cgraphunit.c:1711)
==23693== by 0xD1276D: cgraph_optimize (cgraphunit.c:1967)
==23693==
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-10 22:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-10 23:20 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-10 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-10 23:20 -------
From:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg01081.html
if (!df_live_scratch)
- df_live_scratch = BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL);
+ df_live_scratch = BITMAP_ALLOC (&problem_data->live_bitmaps);
...
+ bitmap_obstack_release (&problem_data->live_bitmaps);
if (df_live_scratch)
BITMAP_FREE (df_live_scratch);
We are calling bitmap_obstack_free after bitmap_obstack_release is called.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-10 23:20 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-11 17:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-11 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-11 17:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-12 15:21 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-06-11 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-11 17:48 -------
For the record revision 160549 also broke boostrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10.3.0
near the end of stage 2:
echo CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS = '' >> tmp-libgcc.mvars
echo CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS_S = '' >> tmp-libgcc.mvars
echo TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT = '' >> tmp-libgcc.mvars
mv tmp-libgcc.mvars libgcc.mvars
../../work/gcc/config/i386/i386.md: In function 'internal_dfa_insn_code':
../../work/gcc/config/i386/i386.md:358:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
Since it is now fixed with revision 160612, I don't see the point to fill an
obvious duplicate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-11 17:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-06-12 15:21 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-12 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-12 15:21 -------
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgomp/44498] [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-12 15:21 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-12 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-06-12 15:21 -------
*** Bug 44497 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44498
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-12 15:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-10 22:06 [Bug libgomp/44498] New: [4.6 Regression] Many libgomp failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:41 ` [Bug libgomp/44498] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:42 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 22:54 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-10 23:20 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-11 12:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-11 17:48 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-12 15:21 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-06-12 15:22 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).