public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/44563] GCC uses a lot of RAM when compiling a large numbers of functions Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 00:22:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-44563-4-090TdHcbi1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-44563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563 --- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Yeah, this is the old problem that after each inline we recompute the size of the whole function inlined into. This means walking the whole inline tree and sum size of all non-inlined call sites. If you get very many functions inlined into single caller, the nonlinearity kicks in. Here the main() function calls 65536 empty functions that takes time to process. My plan is to turn the sizes/times to sreal and then update them incrementally (subtract size of the call statement and account changes). With old fixed point+capping this did not work well and I always ended up with too many of misaccounting issues. This is however more intrussive then what I would like to do in stage3. I did not completed the sreal conversion because sreal class came bit too late in this development cycle. Have unfinished patch for that but it is >100K and hits interestin problems like gengtype not understanding sreal.h header. I will perf it and check for micro-optimization possibilities.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-07 0:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-44563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-12-12 23:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 0:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 1:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 1:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 1:17 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 1:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 13:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-17 0:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-07 0:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-03-09 9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 4:55 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-10 8:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 8:35 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-10 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:51 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-10 13:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-12 15:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:43 ` [Bug ipa/44563] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-16 0:07 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2024-02-16 13:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-06-17 4:10 [Bug c/44563] New: " jvoss at altsci dot com 2010-06-17 4:14 ` [Bug tree-optimization/44563] " jvoss at altsci dot com 2010-06-17 10:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-44563-4-090TdHcbi1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).