public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/44563] GCC uses a lot of RAM when compiling a large numbers of functions Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:00:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-44563-4-rf0rZuulMS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-44563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-13 00:59:53 UTC --- ... actually split_bb does not use gsi_for_stmt since it has to walk all the statements in the BB anyway. It seems that it is one of routines updating callers from cgraph edges.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 1:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-44563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-12-12 23:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 0:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 1:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2010-12-13 1:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 1:17 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 1:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 13:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-17 0:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-07 0:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-09 15:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 4:55 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2015-03-10 8:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 8:35 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-10 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-10 12:51 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2015-03-10 13:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-12 15:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:43 ` [Bug ipa/44563] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-13 8:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-03-16 0:07 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2024-02-16 13:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-06-17 4:10 [Bug c/44563] New: " jvoss at altsci dot com 2010-06-17 4:14 ` [Bug tree-optimization/44563] " jvoss at altsci dot com 2010-06-17 10:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-17 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-44563-4-rf0rZuulMS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).