From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20637 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2010 01:00:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 20594 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2010 01:00:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_TM X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 00:59:57 +0000 From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/44563] GCC uses a lot of RAM when compiling a large numbers of functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 01:00:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01346.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-13 00:59:53 UTC --- ... actually split_bb does not use gsi_for_stmt since it has to walk all the statements in the BB anyway. It seems that it is one of routines updating callers from cgraph edges.