public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/44563] GCC uses a lot of RAM when compiling a large numbers of functions
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-44563-4-uXks1sN1ap@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-44563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44563

--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> callgrind shows the cgraph_edge_hasher quite high in the profile (via
> redirect_all_calls).  I suppose as the large main is a single BB walking
> all stmts over-and-over is quite bad.  Also hash_pointer isn't inlined!?
> Ah - it's external in libiberty hashtab.c ... - it should transition to
> using/inheriting from pointer_hash.
> 
> cgraph_edge *
> cgraph_node::get_edge (gimple call_stmt)
> {
>   cgraph_edge *e, *e2;
>   int n = 0;
> 
>   if (call_site_hash)
>     return call_site_hash->find_with_hash (call_stmt,
>                                            htab_hash_pointer (call_stmt));
> 

Btw, for 10000 calls (smaller testcase) we get 100 000 000 calls to
cgraph_edge::redirect_call_stmt_to_callee () (that's from 40000
redirect_all_calls calls which is from 10000 optimize_inline_calls calls).

Ah - we do this also for the ENTRY/EXIT block!

Index: gcc/tree-inline.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/tree-inline.c   (revision 221278)
+++ gcc/tree-inline.c   (working copy)
@@ -2802,11 +2802,13 @@ copy_cfg_body (copy_body_data * id, gcov
        if (need_debug_cleanup
            && bb->index != ENTRY_BLOCK
            && bb->index != EXIT_BLOCK)
-         maybe_move_debug_stmts_to_successors (id, (basic_block) bb->aux);
-       /* Update call edge destinations.  This can not be done before loop
-          info is updated, because we may split basic blocks.  */
-       if (id->transform_call_graph_edges == CB_CGE_DUPLICATE)
-         redirect_all_calls (id, (basic_block)bb->aux);
+         {
+           maybe_move_debug_stmts_to_successors (id, (basic_block) bb->aux);
+           /* Update call edge destinations.  This can not be done before loop
+              info is updated, because we may split basic blocks.  */
+           if (id->transform_call_graph_edges == CB_CGE_DUPLICATE)
+             redirect_all_calls (id, (basic_block)bb->aux);
+         }
        ((basic_block)bb->aux)->aux = NULL;
        bb->aux = NULL;
       }

makes sense?

> The estimate_calls_size_and_time portion is quite smaller.
> 
> cleanup-cfgs main portion is split_bb_on_noreturn_calls.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-09 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-44563-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-12 23:55 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13  0:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13  1:00 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13  1:07 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13  1:17 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13  1:47 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13 13:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-17  0:08 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-07  0:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09  9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 11:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-09 15:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-03-09 15:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10  4:55 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2015-03-10  8:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10  8:35 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-10 11:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10 12:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10 12:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10 12:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-10 12:51 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-03-10 13:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-12 15:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-13  8:43 ` [Bug ipa/44563] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-13  8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-13  8:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-13  8:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-03-16  0:07 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2024-02-16 13:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-06-17  4:10 [Bug c/44563] New: " jvoss at altsci dot com
2010-06-17  4:14 ` [Bug tree-optimization/44563] " jvoss at altsci dot com
2010-06-17 10:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-17 10:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-17 12:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-44563-4-uXks1sN1ap@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).