From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-421218-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31860 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2013 17:24:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31823 invoked by uid 55); 29 Apr 2013 17:24:44 -0000
From: "tejohnson at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/44578] GCC generates MMX instructions but fails to generate "emms"
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:24:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tejohnson at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-44578-4-K3SVGwqEmj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg02363.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44578

--- Comment #9 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> 2013-04-29 17:24:42 UTC ---
It does fix the issue I had in this test case. But theoretically can't
this pattern still generate an MMX reference in some cases? And I see
other instances of the same constraint in i386.md - is there a larger
issue here and how can we prevent this?

Thanks!
Teresa

On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:13 AM, ubizjak at gmail dot com
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44578
>
> --- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2013-04-29 17:13:30 UTC ---
> Please try following patch, it fixes the testcase for me (note "!" for ?*y
> alternative):
>
> --cut here--
> Index: i386.md
> ===================================================================
> --- i386.md     (revision 198401)
> +++ i386.md     (working copy)
> @@ -3049,10 +3049,10 @@
>
>  (define_insn "*zero_extendsidi2"
>    [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
> -                       "=r,?r,?o,r   ,o,?*Ym,?*y,?*Yi,?*x")
> +                       "=r,?r,?o,r   ,o,?*Ym,?!*y,?*Yi,?*x")
>         (zero_extend:DI
>          (match_operand:SI 1 "x86_64_zext_operand"
> -                       "0 ,rm,r ,rmWz,0,r   ,m  ,r   ,m")))]
> +                       "0 ,rm,r ,rmWz,0,r   ,m   ,r   ,m")))]
>    ""
>  {
>    switch (get_attr_type (insn))
> --cut here--
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug.