public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/44654] New: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS
@ 2010-06-24 11:56 amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 13:24 ` [Bug testsuite/44654] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
When I do:
make check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS='gfortran.dg/dg.exp=data_invalid.f90'
the entire gfortran.dg/dg.exp testsuite is run.
--
Summary: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test
specification in RUNTESTFLAGS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44654
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/44654] check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS
2010-06-24 11:56 [Bug testsuite/44654] New: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 13:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-24 13:37 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-06-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-24 13:24 -------
Confirmed. Yet another bug or feature dilemma!-)
Using
make check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=data_invalid.f90'
works for me. I don't know what "gfortran.dg/" is supposed to do.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44654
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/44654] check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS
2010-06-24 11:56 [Bug testsuite/44654] New: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 13:24 ` [Bug testsuite/44654] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-06-24 13:37 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 14:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 13:36 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed. Yet another bug or feature dilemma!-)
>
> Using
>
> make check-fortran RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=data_invalid.f90'
>
> works for me. I don't know what "gfortran.dg/" is supposed to do.
It's supposed to specify the testsuite driver. That it does, but then
it forgets that it was supposed to run a specific test.
E.g.:
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS='execute.exp=arith-rand.c'
Will run the driver execute.exp, telling it to only run tests
that match arith-rand.c .
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44654
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/44654] check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS
2010-06-24 11:56 [Bug testsuite/44654] New: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 13:24 ` [Bug testsuite/44654] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-24 13:37 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 14:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-24 15:22 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 15:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2010-06-24 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-06-24 14:52 -------
> It's supposed to specify the testsuite driver. That it does, but then
> it forgets that it was supposed to run a specific test.
dg.exp=files_to_test
does it (without path).
What is not clear to me is what 'gfortran.dg/dg.exp=files_to_test' (with
partial path) is supposed to do. Presently it acts as if
'gfortran.dg/dg.exp=files_to_test' is just dropped and the full test is run.
May be one could want that it emits an error and stop, or matches the partial
path, or ... .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44654
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/44654] check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS
2010-06-24 11:56 [Bug testsuite/44654] New: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-24 14:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2010-06-24 15:22 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 15:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 15:22 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> > It's supposed to specify the testsuite driver. That it does, but then
> > it forgets that it was supposed to run a specific test.
>
> dg.exp=files_to_test
>
> does it (without path).
Well, an awfulk lot of drivers are named dg.exp, so I wasn't sure
it it was specific enough. I know when I do this with check-gcc
one level up, I get lots of matches.
When I try an absolute pathname, I get an error.
A relative pathname with anything more that gfortran/dg.exp doesn't match
anything.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44654
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/44654] check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS
2010-06-24 11:56 [Bug testsuite/44654] New: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-06-24 15:22 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 15:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 15:31 -------
See comment #1.
check-fortran
already selects from the various dg.exps.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44654
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-24 15:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-24 11:56 [Bug testsuite/44654] New: check-fortran / gfortran.dg/dg.exp ignores test specification in RUNTESTFLAGS amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 13:24 ` [Bug testsuite/44654] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-24 13:37 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 14:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-06-24 15:22 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 15:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).