From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-413531-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6234 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2013 12:43:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 6127 invoked by uid 48); 29 Jan 2013 12:43:14 -0000
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/44830] Function return-type declaration with specification expression rejected for renamed derived types
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-44830-4-9QjDpbEzbf@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44830-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44830-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg02650.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44830

Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-29 12:43:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> This may be related to bug41370, which is about a similar issue for character
> length expressions in the return type.

Well, no.  It is an issue with USE-renamed symbols and IMPORT.  So not related
to PR41370.

(In reply to comment #1)
> The code compiles without error after revision 195506.
> If the code is valid as I think, this PR can be closed as fixed with pr53537.
> If it is not valid, somebody will have to explain why.

Yeah, it's the same problem.  The test cases are almost the same.  Closing as
duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53537 ***