From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-340651-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20501 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2010 18:50:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 20486 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2010 18:50:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:50:31 +0000
From: "ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/44952] #include <iostream> implies global constructor.
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-44952-4-sGutiqpaTG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:50:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01634.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44952

Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #15 from Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-14 18:50:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> So reopening for this enhancement...
> 
> Another alternative would be some .init.first array or something similar which
> would contain pointers to functions to be run as early constructors and linker
> would remove duplicates in it and put it at the beginning of .init_array
> section.

For ELF targets, this is what DT_PREINIT_ARRAY is for.

http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch5.dynamic.html#init_fini

-cary