From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-473299-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13230 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2015 08:28:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13162 invoked by uid 55); 15 Jan 2015 08:28:45 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/44982] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE in get_narrower, at tree.c:7832
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: steven at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-44982-4-EKpDvfleKw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44982-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44982-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01293.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44982

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44982
> 
> tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #10 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > Confirmed.
> 
> hm, wfm, but it looks like the patch in comment 3 wasn't applied.  Is there
> something to do here?

Not sure if it was posted or tested - so maybe just do a bootstrap & 
regtest with all languages and if that succeeds the patch  (with the
testcase) is preapproved.