public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
@ 2010-07-22 10:10 ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 10:23 ` [Bug bootstrap/45028] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (24 more replies)
0 siblings, 25 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
This patch
2010-07-20 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* var-tracking.c (vt_expand_loc, vt_expand_loc_dummy): Bump maximum
depth to 8 from 5.
broke sparc-sun-solaris2.* bootstrap building 64-bit libjava:
$ /var/gcc/gcc-4.6.0-20100721/11-gcc-gas/./gcc/gcj
-B/var/gcc/gcc-4.6.0-20100721/11-gcc-gas/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sparcv9/libjava/
-B/var/gcc/gcc-4.6.0-20100721/11-gcc-gas/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sparcv9/libjava/
-B/var/gcc/gcc-4.6.0-20100721/11-gcc-gas/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/bin/ -B/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/lib/
-isystem /usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/include -isystem
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sys-include -m64 -Usun -fclasspath=
-fbootclasspath=/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/libjava/classpath/lib
--encoding=UTF-8 -Wno-deprecated -fbootstrap-classes -g -O2 -m64 -c
-fsource-filename=/var/gcc/gcc-4.6.0-20100721/11-gcc-gas/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/sparcv9/libjava/classpath/lib/classes
-MT gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults.lo -MD -MP -MF
gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults.deps
@gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults.list -o
gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults.o
jc1: internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
This happens only for the non-PIC case.
--
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris
2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2*
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2*
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 10:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 10:35 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (23 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 10:23 -------
That would be a target bug then, something isn't delegitimized when it should.
Please put a breakpoint on output_operand_lossage and print a backtrace and the
rtx that is being printed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 10:23 ` [Bug bootstrap/45028] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 10:35 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-07-22 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-22 10:35 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC:
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
Here you go:
Breakpoint 5, output_operand_lossage (cmsgid=0xfe940c60 "") at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/final.c:3080
(gdb) where
#0 output_operand_lossage (cmsgid=0xfe940c60 "") at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/final.c:3080
#1 0x00318d9c in output_addr_const (file=0xf52958, x=0xfe2d8e60) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/final.c:3635
#2 0x002388d0 in dw2_assemble_integer (size=8, x=0xfe2d8e60) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2asm.c:59
#3 0x00238fd8 in dw2_asm_output_addr_rtx (size=8, addr=0xfe2d8e60,
comment=0x0) at /var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2asm.c:282
#4 0x00249ec0 in output_loc_operands (loc=0xfe2f28c0) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:5126
#5 0x0024a1a4 in output_loc_sequence (loc=0xfe2f28c0) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:5151
#6 0x002591f0 in output_loc_list (list_head=0xfe2dd230) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:10839
#7 0x00257274 in output_location_lists (die=0xfe2f0ba0) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:10226
#8 0x00257304 in output_location_lists (die=0xfe2f0b40) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:10228
#9 0x00257304 in output_location_lists (die=0xfe2801b0) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:10228
#10 0x00257304 in output_location_lists (die=0xfe280180) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:10228
#11 0x00257304 in output_location_lists (die=0xfe9d00f0) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:10228
#12 0x00289b6c in dwarf2out_finish (filename=0xffbff3af <error reading
variable>) at /var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/dwarf2out.c:22414
#13 0x006f6670 in compile_file () at /var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:1025
#14 0x006fa048 in do_compile () at /var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:2333
#15 0x006fa174 in toplev_main (argc=33, argv=0xffbff1c4) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:2374
#16 0x0010af18 in main (argc=33, argv=0xffbff1c4) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/main.c:36
(gdb) up
#1 0x00318d9c in output_addr_const (file=0xf52958, x=0xfe2d8e60) at
/var/gcc/reghunt/trunk/gcc/final.c:3635
(gdb) p x
$1 = (rtx) 0xfe2d8e60
(gdb) pr
(unspec:DI [
(symbol_ref:DI
("_ZN3gnu5javax5print3ipp9attribute8defaults17FinishingsDefault15EDGE_STITCH_TOPE")
[flags 0x2] <var_decl fe7c0cc0 EDGE_STITCH_TOP>)
] 7)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 10:23 ` [Bug bootstrap/45028] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 10:35 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-22 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 12:09 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 10:46 -------
This one actually shouldn't be IMHO delegimized, the setm44 value is just a
temporary and thus it shouldn't hold any value interesting for debug info.
Can you please attach -fdump-rtl-vartrack dump?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 12:09 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 12:10 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (20 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 12:09 -------
Created an attachment (id=21281)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21281&action=view)
-fdump-rtl-vartrack output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 12:09 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 12:10 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 13:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-07-22 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-22 12:10 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC:
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
> ------- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 10:46 -------
> This one actually shouldn't be IMHO delegimized, the setm44 value is just a
> temporary and thus it shouldn't hold any value interesting for debug info.
> Can you please attach -fdump-rtl-vartrack dump?
Done. It took me some time because the files isn't created in the
working directory, but in the depths of gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute ;-(
I had to run jc1 under truss to find it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 12:10 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-22 13:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:10 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 13:02 -------
Thanks, can I also ask for -fdump-rtl-aligments dump (i.e. one immediately
before *.vartrack)?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 13:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 13:10 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 13:09 -------
Created an attachment (id=21283)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21283&action=view)
-fdump-rtl-alignments output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 13:10 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (16 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 13:34 -------
So it is wrong already before *.alignments, as it has stuff like:
(insn:TI 256 255 1556 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:117
(set (reg:D
I 1 %g1 [328])
(ashift:DI (reg:DI 1 %g1 [327])
(const_int 12 [0xc]))) 356 {*ashldi3_sp64} (nil))
(debug_insn 1556 256 262 2 (var_location:DI D#71 (reg/f:DI 1 %g1 [332])) -1
(nil))
(insn 262 1556 258 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(set (reg:DI 8 %o0)
(lo_sum:DI (reg:DI 4 %g4)
(symbol_ref:DI
("_ZN3gnu5javax5print3ipp9attribute8defaults17FinishingsDefault6class$E")
[flags 0x2] <var_decl fe823740
gnu.javax.print.ipp.attribute.defaults.FinishingsDefault.class$$>))) 71
{setl44} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 4 %g4)
(expr_list:REG_EQUAL (symbol_ref:DI
("_ZN3gnu5javax5print3ipp9attribute8defaults17FinishingsDefault6class$E")
[flags 0x2] <var_decl fe823740
gnu.javax.print.ipp.attribute.defaults.FinishingsDefault.class$$>)
(nil))))
Can you compile with -da and find out in which dump D#71 has been introduced?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 13:51 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-07-22 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-22 13:50 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC:
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
> Can you compile with -da and find out in which dump D#71 has been introduced?
Sure: it first appeared in sched2. Uploading that as we speak.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-22 13:51 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 13:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=21284)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21284&action=view)
sched2 dump
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 13:51 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 13:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 13:52 -------
Can I ask for the immediately preceeding dump too? Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 13:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 13:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 13:54 -------
Created an attachment (id=21285)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21285&action=view)
split4 dump
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 13:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 14:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:06 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 14:03 -------
So it is wrong already in *.split4:
(insn 256 255 258 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:117
(set (reg:DI 1 %g1 [328])
(ashift:DI (reg:DI 1 %g1 [327])
(const_int 12 [0xc]))) 356 {*ashldi3_sp64} (nil))
(insn 258 256 263 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:117
(set (mem/f/c/i:DI (lo_sum:DI (reg:DI 1 %g1 [328])
(symbol_ref:DI
("_ZN3gnu5javax5print3ipp9attribute8defaults17FinishingsDefault15EDGE_STITCH_TOPE")
[flags 0x2] <var_decl fe7c0cc0EDGE_STITCH_TOP>)) [30 EDGE_STITCH_TOP+0 S8
A64])
(reg/f:DI 21 %l5 [324])) 60 {*movdi_insn_sp64} (expr_list:REG_DEAD
(reg/f:DI 21 %l5 [324])
(expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 1 %g1 [328])
(nil))))
(call_insn 263 258 266 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(parallel [
(set (reg:DI 8 %o0)
(call (mem:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("_Jv_AllocObjectNoFinalizer")
[flags 0x41] <function_decl fe798280 _Jv_AllocObjectNoFinalizer>) [0 S8 A64])
(const_int 0 [0])))
(clobber (reg:DI 15 %o7))
]) 388 {*call_value_symbolic_sp64} (nil)
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (use (reg:DI 8 %o0))
(nil)))
(debug_insn 266 263 267 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(var_location:DI this (reg/f:DI 1 %g1 [332])) -1 (nil))
This can't be right, %g1 as call clobbered register should have undefined value
after the call (and, nothing really meaningful before the call).
Could you attach -fdump-rtl-expand and -fdump-tree-optimized?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 14:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 14:06 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 14:06 -------
Created an attachment (id=21286)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21286&action=view)
-fdump-rtl-expand output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 14:06 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 14:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 14:07 -------
Created an attachment (id=21287)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21287&action=view)
-fdump-tree-optimized output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 14:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 14:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:29 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (8 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 14:20 -------
(insn 264 263 265 3
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(set (reg/f:DI 332)
(reg:DI 8 %o0)) -1 (expr_list:REG_NOALIAS (reg/f:DI 332)
(nil)))
(insn 265 264 266 3
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(set (reg/f:DI 119 [ #ref#0#1 ])
(reg/f:DI 332)) -1 (nil))
(debug_insn 266 265 267 3
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(var_location:DI this (reg/f:DI 119 [ #ref#0#1 ])) -1 (nil))
in *.expand looks correct, that var_location is %o0 instead of %g1 though. So
the bug is somewhere in between. Would it be too large if you tarred up all
dumps in between expand and split4?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 14:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 14:29 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 14:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-07-22 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-22 14:29 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC:
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
> in *.expand looks correct, that var_location is %o0 instead of %g1 though. So
> the bug is somewhere in between. Would it be too large if you tarred up all
> dumps in between expand and split4?
Even compressed with bzip2, the file is 2.8 MB, way too big for
Bugzilla. I've placed it at
http://www.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/~ro/files/dumps146-206.tar.bz2
instead.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 14:29 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-22 14:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 15:05 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (6 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 14:58 -------
Sounds like a cprop_hardreg bug. Before that pass we have (after a call_insn):
(insn 264 263 266 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(set (reg/f:DI 1 %g1 [332])
(reg:DI 8 %o0)) 60 {*movdi_insn_sp64} (expr_list:REG_NOALIAS (reg/f:DI
1 %g1 [332])
(nil)))
(debug_insn 266 264 267 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(var_location:DI this (reg/f:DI 1 %g1 [332])) -1 (nil))
...
(insn 1290 273 274 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:199
(set (mem/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 30 %fp)
(const_int 2023 [0x7e7])) [53 S8 A64])
(reg:DI 1 %g1)) 60 {*movdi_insn_sp64} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 1
%g1)
(nil)))
but in *.cprop_hardreg:
(insn 264 263 266 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(set (reg/f:DI 1 %g1 [332])
(reg:DI 8 %o0)) 60 {*movdi_insn_sp64} (expr_list:REG_NOALIAS (reg/f:DI
1 %g1 [332])
(nil)))
(debug_insn 266 264 267 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:123
(var_location:DI this (reg/f:DI 1 %g1 [332])) -1 (nil))
...
(insn 1290 273 274 2
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libjava/classpath/gnu/javax/print/ipp/attribute/defaults/FinishingsDefault.java:199
(set (mem/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 30 %fp)
(const_int 2023 [0x7e7])) [53 S8 A64])
(reg:DI 8 %o0 [1])) 60 {*movdi_insn_sp64} (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:DI 1
%g1)
(nil)))
The %g1 use in 1290 was the only use of %g1 in real insns, but cprop_hardreg
failed to replace the %g1 uses in debug_insn for some reason. Then in *.dce
the insn 264 is removed as dead, but nothing resets the debug_insns.
Rainer, do you think you could run make check in gcc/ subdir (assuming libjava
was the last unbuilt library and say libstdc++/libgfortran/libgomp are already
built) to see if this can be reproduced even on some C or C++ testcase?
Debugging Java failures with cross isn't fun.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-07-22 14:58:37
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 14:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 15:05 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-07-22 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-22 15:04 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC:
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
> ------- Comment #18 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 14:58 -------
> Rainer, do you think you could run make check in gcc/ subdir (assuming libjava
> was the last unbuilt library and say libstdc++/libgfortran/libgomp are already
> built) to see if this can be reproduced even on some C or C++ testcase?
Sure, otherwise I'll start a fresh bootstrap with java excluded, which I
know finishes since I tried it with unrelated changes.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 15:05 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-22 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 15:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (4 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #20 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 15:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=21288)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21288&action=view)
gcc46-pr45028.patch
I wonder if the attached (untested) patch wouldn't fix this problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-22 15:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 20:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-07-22 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #21 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-22 15:54 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC:
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
> ------- Comment #20 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 15:32 -------
> Created an attachment (id=21288)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21288&action=view)
> --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21288&action=view)
> gcc46-pr45028.patch
>
> I wonder if the attached (untested) patch wouldn't fix this problem.
It does :-) I'll fire off a full bootstrap to check.
Thanks a lot.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 15:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-22 20:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-23 8:59 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
` (2 subsequent siblings)
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-22 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #22 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-22 20:49 -------
Subject: Bug 45028
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 22 20:48:42 2010
New Revision: 162427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162427
Log:
PR bootstrap/45028
* recgprop.c (copyprop_hardreg_forward_1): If changed is true,
call cprop_find_used_regs again via note_uses.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/regcprop.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-22 20:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-23 8:59 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-31 10:22 ` [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-25 9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-07-23 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-23 08:59 -------
Subject: Re: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC:
output_operand: invalid expression as operand
The sparc-sun-solaris2.10 bootstrap completed successfully with your
patch and testsuite results are back to normal (i.e. a considerable
number of unrelated failures and regressions, but nothing too bad ;-)
Thanks a lot for your quick help.
Rainer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 Regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-23 8:59 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-31 10:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-25 9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-31 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.6 regression] ICE |[4.6 Regression] ICE
|building 64-bit libjava on |building 64-bit libjava on
|Solaris 2/SPARC: |Solaris 2/SPARC:
|output_operand: invalid |output_operand: invalid
|expression as operand |expression as operand
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
* [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 Regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-31 10:22 ` [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-25 9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-25 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #24 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-25 09:53 -------
Fixed.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45028
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-25 9:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-22 10:10 [Bug bootstrap/45028] New: [4.6 regression] ICE building 64-bit libjava on Solaris 2/SPARC: output_operand: invalid expression as operand ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 10:23 ` [Bug bootstrap/45028] " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 10:35 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 10:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 12:09 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 12:10 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 13:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:10 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 13:51 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 13:54 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:06 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:07 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 14:29 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 14:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 15:05 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 15:33 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 15:54 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-22 20:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-23 8:59 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-31 10:22 ` [Bug bootstrap/45028] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-25 9:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).