From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-325755-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28570 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2010 02:43:08 -0000
Received: (qmail 26428 invoked by uid 48); 24 Jul 2010 02:42:50 -0000
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 02:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/45051]  New: [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c and abs-3.c due to "track subwords of DImode allocnos"
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-45051-507@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-07/txt/msg02587.txt.bz2

With revision 162417 this test passed.
>>From revision 162418 and on, these tests (or "this test" as abs-3.c is
effectively the same as abs-2.c) has failed as follows:
Running
/tmp/badabs/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/builtins.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c execution,  -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c execution,  -O2 -flto 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c execution,  -O2 -fwhopr 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-3.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-3.c execution,  -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-3.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-3.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-3.c execution,  -O2 -flto 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-3.c execution,  -O2 -fwhopr 

With the message in the logfile being:
...
PASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c compilation,  -O2 
program stopped with signal 6.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c execution,  -O2 
...
(i.e. abort being called)

Author of patch in suspect revision range CC:ed.

At a glance, the code change causes a register containing 0 to be used as
containing 0xffffffff for the low-part of 9223372036854775807LL ((1<<63)-1),
i.e. a mis-tracking of a DImode subreg.

I'll attach a smaller test-case and an assembly diff pointing out the wrong
code.


-- 
           Summary: [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c
                    and abs-3.c due to "track subwords of DImode allocnos"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: wrong-code
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: cris-axis-elf


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45051