From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15399 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2011 05:09:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 15335 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2011 05:09:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_SG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 05:09:32 +0000 From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/45170] [F2003] allocatable character lengths X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 05:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00918.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170 --- Comment #22 from Steve Kargl 2011-08-09 05:09:13 UTC --- On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:26:49AM +0000, damian at rouson dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170 > > --- Comment #21 from Damian Rouson 2011-08-09 04:26:45 UTC --- > Thanks but even the version with the "extraneous garbage" was reduced relative > to what I really want to do (which includes making the speaker type abstract > and the speak type-bound procedure deferred with a specified abstract > interface) so having the reduced case doesn't help much. > > Regardless, hopefully you'll agree that an ICE is a compiler bug. I guess the > question is whether it is another example of Bug 45170 or should be submitted > as a separate bug. Yes, it is bug. It is not as drastic as you stated. Clearly, I demonstrated that a function can have a deferred type parameter as a result. The problem appears to be an OOP issue.