public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/45176]  New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop
@ 2010-08-04  9:06 bmei at broadcom dot com
  2010-08-04  9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bmei at broadcom dot com @ 2010-08-04  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

void foo (int * restrict a, int * restrict b, int * restrict c)
{
   int i;
   for(i = 0; i < 100; i+=4)
     {
       a[i] = b[i] * c[i];
       a[i+1] = b[i+1] * c[i+1];
       a[i+2] = b[i+2] * c[i+2];
       a[i+3] = b[i+3] * c[i+3];
     }
}   

Trunk x86-64 compiler (162821) produces code that later load instructions are
not scheduled before the previous store instructions as expected. Clearly,
restrict qualifier is not used here. 

 ~/work/install-x86/bin/gcc tst3.c -O2 -S -std=c99 -da -fschedule-insns
-frename-registers
.L2:
        movl    (%rdx,%rax), %r10d
        imull   (%rsi,%rax), %r10d
        movl    %r10d, (%rdi,%rax)
        movl    4(%rdx,%rax), %r9d
        imull   4(%rsi,%rax), %r9d
        movl    %r9d, 4(%rdi,%rax)
        movl    8(%rdx,%rax), %r8d
        imull   8(%rsi,%rax), %r8d
        movl    %r8d, 8(%rdi,%rax)
        movl    12(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
        imull   12(%rsi,%rax), %ecx
        movl    %ecx, 12(%rdi,%rax)
        addq    $16, %rax
        cmpq    $400, %rax

Richard has a patch and it seems to work for this example. 
Index: expr.c
===================================================================
--- expr.c      (revision 162841)
+++ expr.c      (working copy)
@@ -8665,7 +8665,7 @@ expand_expr_real_1 (tree exp, rtx target
        set_mem_addr_space (temp, as);
        base = get_base_address (TMR_ORIGINAL (exp));
        if (base
-           && INDIRECT_REF_P (base)
+           && (INDIRECT_REF_P (base) || TREE_CODE (base) == MEM_REF)
            && TMR_BASE (exp)
            && TREE_CODE (TMR_BASE (exp)) == SSA_NAME
            && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TMR_BASE (exp))))

The code generated:
.L2:
        movl    (%rdx,%rax), %r10d
        movl    4(%rdx,%rax), %r9d
        imull   (%rsi,%rax), %r10d
        imull   4(%rsi,%rax), %r9d
        movl    8(%rdx,%rax), %r8d
        movl    12(%rdx,%rax), %ecx
        imull   8(%rsi,%rax), %r8d
        imull   12(%rsi,%rax), %ecx
        movl    %r10d, (%rdi,%rax)
        movl    %r9d, 4(%rdi,%rax)
        movl    %r8d, 8(%rdi,%rax)
        movl    %ecx, 12(%rdi,%rax)
        addq    $16, %rax
        cmpq    $400, %rax
        jne     .L2


-- 
           Summary: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled
                    loop
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: bmei at broadcom dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop
  2010-08-04  9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com
@ 2010-08-04  9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04  9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-04 09:19 -------
I'll bootstrap & test that patch.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-08-04 09:19:37
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop
  2010-08-04  9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com
  2010-08-04  9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-04 11:09 -------
Subject: Bug 45176

Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Aug  4 11:08:54 2010
New Revision: 162862

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162862
Log:
2010-08-04  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR middle-end/45176
        * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): Also preserve TARGET_MEM_REF
        points-to set for original MEM_REF.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/expr.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop
  2010-08-04  9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com
  2010-08-04  9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
  2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-04 11:09 -------
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop
  2010-08-04  9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
  2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-05 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com  2010-08-05 13:40 -------
Looks like this missed optimization regression was introduced in gcc 4.5

Are any similar fixes possible in 4.5 branch?


-- 

siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |siarhei dot siamashka at
                   |                            |gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop
  2010-08-04  9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
@ 2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bmei at broadcom dot com @ 2010-08-05 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from bmei at broadcom dot com  2010-08-05 13:44 -------
I tried to apply the patches (this one alone is not enough) Richard suggested.
It becomes a chain of too many patches in the end. I am confident any more to
apply them to 4.5. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-05 13:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-04  9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com
2010-08-04  9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com
2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).