public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop @ 2010-08-04 9:06 bmei at broadcom dot com 2010-08-04 9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 more replies) 0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: bmei at broadcom dot com @ 2010-08-04 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs void foo (int * restrict a, int * restrict b, int * restrict c) { int i; for(i = 0; i < 100; i+=4) { a[i] = b[i] * c[i]; a[i+1] = b[i+1] * c[i+1]; a[i+2] = b[i+2] * c[i+2]; a[i+3] = b[i+3] * c[i+3]; } } Trunk x86-64 compiler (162821) produces code that later load instructions are not scheduled before the previous store instructions as expected. Clearly, restrict qualifier is not used here. ~/work/install-x86/bin/gcc tst3.c -O2 -S -std=c99 -da -fschedule-insns -frename-registers .L2: movl (%rdx,%rax), %r10d imull (%rsi,%rax), %r10d movl %r10d, (%rdi,%rax) movl 4(%rdx,%rax), %r9d imull 4(%rsi,%rax), %r9d movl %r9d, 4(%rdi,%rax) movl 8(%rdx,%rax), %r8d imull 8(%rsi,%rax), %r8d movl %r8d, 8(%rdi,%rax) movl 12(%rdx,%rax), %ecx imull 12(%rsi,%rax), %ecx movl %ecx, 12(%rdi,%rax) addq $16, %rax cmpq $400, %rax Richard has a patch and it seems to work for this example. Index: expr.c =================================================================== --- expr.c (revision 162841) +++ expr.c (working copy) @@ -8665,7 +8665,7 @@ expand_expr_real_1 (tree exp, rtx target set_mem_addr_space (temp, as); base = get_base_address (TMR_ORIGINAL (exp)); if (base - && INDIRECT_REF_P (base) + && (INDIRECT_REF_P (base) || TREE_CODE (base) == MEM_REF) && TMR_BASE (exp) && TREE_CODE (TMR_BASE (exp)) == SSA_NAME && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TMR_BASE (exp)))) The code generated: .L2: movl (%rdx,%rax), %r10d movl 4(%rdx,%rax), %r9d imull (%rsi,%rax), %r10d imull 4(%rsi,%rax), %r9d movl 8(%rdx,%rax), %r8d movl 12(%rdx,%rax), %ecx imull 8(%rsi,%rax), %r8d imull 12(%rsi,%rax), %ecx movl %r10d, (%rdi,%rax) movl %r9d, 4(%rdi,%rax) movl %r8d, 8(%rdi,%rax) movl %ecx, 12(%rdi,%rax) addq $16, %rax cmpq $400, %rax jne .L2 -- Summary: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: bmei at broadcom dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop 2010-08-04 9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com @ 2010-08-04 9:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 09:19 ------- I'll bootstrap & test that patch. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-08-04 09:19:37 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop 2010-08-04 9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com 2010-08-04 9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 11:09 ------- Subject: Bug 45176 Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 4 11:08:54 2010 New Revision: 162862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162862 Log: 2010-08-04 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de> PR middle-end/45176 * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1): Also preserve TARGET_MEM_REF points-to set for original MEM_REF. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/expr.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop 2010-08-04 9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com 2010-08-04 9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-04 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 11:09 ------- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop 2010-08-04 9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-05 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-08-05 13:40 ------- Looks like this missed optimization regression was introduced in gcc 4.5 Are any similar fixes possible in 4.5 branch? -- siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |siarhei dot siamashka at | |gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/45176] restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop 2010-08-04 9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: bmei at broadcom dot com @ 2010-08-05 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from bmei at broadcom dot com 2010-08-05 13:44 ------- I tried to apply the patches (this one alone is not enough) Richard suggested. It becomes a chain of too many patches in the end. I am confident any more to apply them to 4.5. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45176 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-05 13:44 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-08-04 9:06 [Bug c/45176] New: restrict qualifier is not used in a manually unrolled loop bmei at broadcom dot com 2010-08-04 9:20 ` [Bug c/45176] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 11:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-05 13:41 ` siarhei dot siamashka at gmail dot com 2010-08-05 13:44 ` bmei at broadcom dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).