From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-327631-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5083 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2010 15:43:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 4930 invoked by uid 48); 12 Aug 2010 15:43:09 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:43:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug middle-end/45266]  New: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-45266-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg01004.txt.bz2

On Linux/x86-64, revision 163191 gave

FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90  -O  scan-tree-dump-times original
"memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all)" 2
FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90  -O  scan-tree-dump-times original
"memcpy|(ref-all.*ref-all)" 2

Revision 163187 is OK. This may be caused by revision 163189:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00400.html

Linux/ia32 doesn't have this regression.


-- 
           Summary: [4.6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_memcpy_3.f90
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45266