public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/45383]  New: [g++ >= 4.5 ] Implicit conversion to pointer does no longer automatically generate operator== and operator!=.
@ 2010-08-23 13:00 seysayux at gmail dot com
  2010-08-23 13:17 ` [Bug c++/45383] [4.5/4.6 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: seysayux at gmail dot com @ 2010-08-23 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Consider this code:
--------------------
#include <iostream>
struct null {
    null() {}
    template<class T>
    operator T*() const {
        return 0;
    }

    template<class C, class T>
    operator T C::*() const {
        return 0;
    }
private:
    null(const null&);
    null& operator=(const null&);
    void operator&() const;
};

static struct null null;

int main() {
    int* ptr = null;
    std::cout << (ptr == null) << ", " << (ptr != null);
    return 0;
}
--------------------------------
This compiles and gives the expected output ("true, false") on the following
platforms:

http://codepad.org (GCC 4.1, Linux)
Ubuntu 9.10, GCC 4.3
Ubuntu 10.04, GCC 4.4
Mac OS X 10.6, GCC 4.2
Mac OS X 10.6, GCC 4.4
Cygwin, GCC 4.3
Cygwin, GCC 4.4
Unknown Linux variant, Clang 2.8 (trunk 111679) (the "clang" bot on
irc.freenode.net)

However, I get following error on these platforms
-------------
error: no match for 'operator==' in 'ptr == null'
-------------
Cygwin, GCC 4.5
Ubuntu 10.04, GCC 4.5
Unknown Linux variant, GCC 4.6.0 20100507 (the "geordi" bot on
irc.freenode.net)

The people in the irc.freenode.net/##c++ channel confirm that this is indeed
valid C++ code and therefore a bug in GCC.

I do not have ready access to some of these systems (anymore), so I can not say
with certainity what their host, target, or build triplets are.


-- 
           Summary: [g++ >= 4.5 ] Implicit conversion to pointer does no
                    longer automatically generate operator== and operator!=.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: seysayux at gmail dot com
 GCC build triplet: (many, read below)
  GCC host triplet: (many, read below)
GCC target triplet: (many, read below)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-28 17:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-45383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-11-08 13:47 ` [Bug c++/45383] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Implicit conversion to pointer does no longer automatically generate operator== and operator!= number.cruncher at ntlworld dot com
2010-11-08 23:11 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-11  8:24   ` Dodji Seketeli
2010-11-11  8:24 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2010-11-29 16:32 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-29 17:08 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-16 13:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-22 16:21 ` [Bug c++/45383] [4.5 " dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 17:44 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-18 14:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-19 23:50 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-27 11:43 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-04-27 12:38 ` dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-04-27 13:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-28 15:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-28 17:05 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-08-23 13:00 [Bug c++/45383] New: [g++ >= 4.5 ] " seysayux at gmail dot com
2010-08-23 13:17 ` [Bug c++/45383] [4.5/4.6 Regression] " redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-23 16:35 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-08-23 20:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-30 16:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).