From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23528 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2013 06:00:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23460 invoked by uid 48); 3 Apr 2013 05:59:57 -0000 From: "abel at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/45472] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [Middle-end volatile semantics] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2 Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:00:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: abel at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00171.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #29 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-03 05:59:53 UTC --- Ported to 4.7 and 4.6, though no bugzilla commit made. Do I close the bug or do we want to fix the front-end to produce the proper volatile bits?