From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4110 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2010 12:17:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 4085 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2010 12:17:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:17:45 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/45475] target use in libcpp breaks LTO bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:35:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg03662.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45475 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30 12:17:31 UTC --- Confirmed. Also doesn't work with -flto-partition=none: > ./xgcc -B. -o t t.c -flto -m32 -march=i386 -flto-partition=none In file included from t.c:16:0, from :0: t.c: In function 'foo': t.c:16:15: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:326 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. lto-wrapper: ./xgcc returned 1 exit status collect2: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit status but we agreed that a target option that changes the mode of types isn't valid and should be rejected by the target. See PR45325 (of which this is IMHO a duplicate).