From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-359991-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2514 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2011 23:01:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 2504 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2011 23:01:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_QN
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:01:17 +0000
From: "rmansfield at qnx dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/45511] ICE in neon_valid_immediate, at config/arm/arm.c:8294
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rmansfield at qnx dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-45511-4-b93YVBJuQM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-45511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:01:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg01517.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511

--- Comment #6 from Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield at qnx dot com> 2011-06-16 23:00:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> EABI targets force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT, so the vast majority of users of 
> the ARM port won't hit this assert.  If you really care about old-ABI 
> targets (and deprecation of arm-linux-gnu and arm-elf is long overdue), 
> maybe ARM should just force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT unconditionally.

Thanks for replying, JSM. Looking at config.gcc, there still seems to be a
quite a number of targets that still use the apcs-gnu ABI. Are you suggesting
all of the non-EABI targets be deprecated, or just the arm-linux-gnu/arm-elf
configurations? Is there any downside or reason why not to add
need_64bit_hwint=yes for all arm targets?