public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/45521] Fortran 2008: GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-02 22:39 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-18 19:19 ` [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-02 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail
| |dot org
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-02 22:38:29 UTC ---
*** Bug 51736 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-02 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/45521] Fortran 2008: GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-18 19:19 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-18 19:40 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-18 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Fortran 2008: GENERIC |[F08] GENERIC resolution
|resolution with |with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER
|ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and |and PROCEDURE
|PROCEDURE |
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-18 19:16:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> *** Bug 51736 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
carrying over test case:
module a
interface testAlloc
module procedure::testAlloc1
module procedure::testAlloc2
end interface
contains
function testAlloc1(obj)
integer,allocatable,intent(in)::obj(:)
logical testAlloc1
testAlloc1=allocated(obj)
end function
function testAlloc2(obj)
integer,pointer,intent(in)::obj(:)
logical testAlloc2
testAlloc2=associated(obj)
end function
end module
program test
use a
integer,pointer::a1(:)=>null()
integer,allocatable::a2(:)
write(*,*),testAlloc(a1),testAlloc(a2)
end program
With current trunk one gets:
module procedure::testAlloc2
1
Error: Ambiguous interfaces 'testalloc2' and 'testalloc1' in generic interface
'testalloc' at (1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-02 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/45521] Fortran 2008: GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-18 19:19 ` [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-18 19:40 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-18 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-18 19:38:10 UTC ---
To implement this, we'll presumably need to modify 'gfc_compare_interfaces' in
interface.c (for the case of generic_flag=1 and strict_flag=0). Possibly the
changes should go directly into 'generic_correspondence'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-18 19:40 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-19 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 12:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-19 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-04-19
Version|4.6.0 |4.8.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-19 12:45:28 UTC ---
Here is a preliminary patch which makes gfortran accept the code in comment #2:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 186485)
+++ gcc/fortran/interface.c (working copy)
@@ -955,7 +955,9 @@ generic_correspondence (gfc_formal_arglist *f1, gf
goto next;
if (f2 != NULL && (compare_type_rank (f1->sym, f2->sym)
- || compare_type_rank (f2->sym, f1->sym)))
+ || compare_type_rank (f2->sym, f1->sym))
+ && !((f1->sym->attr.allocatable && f2->sym->attr.pointer)
+ || (f2->sym->attr.allocatable && f1->sym->attr.pointer)))
goto next;
/* Now search for a disambiguating keyword argument starting at
@@ -966,7 +968,9 @@ generic_correspondence (gfc_formal_arglist *f1, gf
continue;
sym = find_keyword_arg (g->sym->name, f2_save);
- if (sym == NULL || !compare_type_rank (g->sym, sym))
+ if (sym == NULL || !compare_type_rank (g->sym, sym)
+ || (sym->attr.allocatable && g->sym->attr.pointer)
+ || (sym->attr.pointer && g->sym->attr.allocatable))
return 1;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-19 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-19 12:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 13:06 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-19 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-19 12:53:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here is a preliminary patch which makes gfortran accept the code in comment #2:
Of course we need to do more. As quoted in comment #0:
"Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if
- one is a procedure and the other is a data object,
- they are both data objects or known to be functions, and neither is TKR
compatible with the other,
- one has the ALLOCATABLE attribute and the other has the POINTER attribute, or
- one is a function with nonzero rank and the other is not known to be a
function."
The patch above only handles the third item, and the second item works already.
Items #1 and #4 are still missing (I think).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-19 12:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-19 13:06 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-19 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-19 13:04:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if
> - one is a procedure and the other is a data object,
Here is a test case for this item:
module m
interface testIF
module procedure :: test1
module procedure :: test2
end interface
contains
real function test1 (obj)
real :: obj
test1 = obj
end function
real function test2 (obj)
procedure(real) :: pr
test2 = pr(0.)
end function
end module
program test
use m
print *,testIF(2.0),testIF(cos)
end program
... which is currently rejected with:
module procedure :: test2
1
Error: Ambiguous interfaces 'test2' and 'test1' in generic interface 'testif'
at (1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-19 13:06 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-19 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 13:25 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-19 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-19 13:15:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here is a preliminary patch which makes gfortran accept the code in
> comment #2:
Don't forget to add -std=f2003 diagnostic - either by simply marking it as
ambiguous or fancier by telling that it is invalid but would be valid in
Fortran 2008.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-19 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-19 13:25 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
2012-04-19 13:37 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org @ 2012-04-19 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #8 from wangmianzhi <wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org> 2012-04-19 13:20:57 UTC ---
if replace the input argument for test2() with pr, the program will
compile but gives seg fault at run time.
于 2012年04月19日 09:04, janus at gcc dot gnu.org 写道:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
>
> --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-19 13:04:18 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #5)
>> "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if
>> - one is a procedure and the other is a data object,
> Here is a test case for this item:
>
>
> module m
> interface testIF
> module procedure :: test1
> module procedure :: test2
> end interface
> contains
> real function test1 (obj)
> real :: obj
> test1 = obj
> end function
> real function test2 (obj)
> procedure(real) :: pr
> test2 = pr(0.)
> end function
> end module
>
> program test
> use m
> print *,testIF(2.0),testIF(cos)
> end program
>
>
>
> ... which is currently rejected with:
>
>
> module procedure :: test2
> 1
> Error: Ambiguous interfaces 'test2' and 'test1' in generic interface 'testif'
> at (1)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-19 13:25 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
@ 2012-04-19 13:37 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
2012-04-19 13:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org @ 2012-04-19 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #9 from wangmianzhi <wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org> 2012-04-19 13:22:24 UTC ---
if replace the input argument for test2() with pr, the program will compile but
gives seg fault at run time.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-19 13:37 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
@ 2012-04-19 13:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-20 12:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-19 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-19 13:36:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if
> > - one is a procedure and the other is a data object,
>
> Here is a test case for this item:
Sorry, I messed up the declaration of 'test2' (by not using 'implicit none').
Therefore gfortran is correct in rejecting it. It should have been:
module m
implicit none
interface testIF
module procedure test1
module procedure test2
end interface
contains
real function test1 (obj)
real :: obj
test1 = obj
end function
real function test2 (pr)
procedure(real) :: pr
test2 = pr(0.)
end function
end module
program test
use m
implicit none
intrinsic :: cos
print *,testIF(2.0)
print *,testIF(cos)
end program
This is actually accepted by all gfortran versions I tried (4.3,4.6,4.7,trunk).
However, it yields a segfault at runtime (-fdump-tree-original shows that
'test2' is used in both calls).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-19 13:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-20 12:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-20 12:59 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-20 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-20 12:29:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> However, it yields a segfault at runtime (-fdump-tree-original shows that
> 'test2' is used in both calls).
Related to this, it also shows that the specific call
print *,test2(2.0)
is not being rejected, while
print *,test1(cos)
is. For for former, we clearly need to add a check in 'compare_parameter' to
reject it (which should also solve the segfault in comment #10 by selecting the
correct specific function for the generic call).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-20 12:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-20 12:59 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-25 12:30 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-20 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-20 12:58:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> For for former, we clearly need to add a check in 'compare_parameter' to
> reject it
Something like:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 186596)
+++ gcc/fortran/interface.c (working copy)
@@ -1663,6 +1667,13 @@ compare_parameter (gfc_symbol *formal, gfc_expr *a
the module variables are generated. */
gfc_find_derived_vtab (actual->ts.u.derived);
+ if (formal->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE && actual->ts.type != BT_PROCEDURE)
+ {
+ if (where)
+ gfc_error ("Procedure argument expected at %L", &actual->where);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (actual->ts.type == BT_PROCEDURE)
{
char err[200];
This correctly rejects the invalid code in comment #11 and makes the valid code
in comment #10 give the expected output (without segfaulting).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-20 12:59 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-04-25 12:30 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 12:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 12:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-04-25 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-25 12:29:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> > For for former, we clearly need to add a check in 'compare_parameter' to
> > reject it
Actually, we do have a check for this already, which is just not working in
some cases. Therefore the patch in comment #12 is not the right thing to do.
Here is a better one (which is actually free of testsuite regressions):
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 186596)
+++ gcc/fortran/interface.c (working copy)
@@ -2393,9 +2397,8 @@ compare_actual_formal (gfc_actual_arglist **ap, gf
/* Satisfy 12.4.1.2 by ensuring that a procedure actual argument is
provided for a procedure formal argument. */
- if (a->expr->ts.type != BT_PROCEDURE && !gfc_is_proc_ptr_comp (a->expr,
NULL)
- && a->expr->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE
- && f->sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE)
+ if (f->sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE
+ && gfc_expr_attr (a->expr).flavor != FL_PROCEDURE)
{
if (where)
gfc_error ("Expected a procedure for argument '%s' at %L",
Cleanup side note: A lot of the stuff in 'compare_actual_formal' could probably
be moved into 'compare_parameter'. It does not really make a difference, but
the distinction of what goes where seems completely arbitrary right now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2012-04-25 12:30 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-06 12:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 12:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-06 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 12:20:17 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Oct 6 12:20:09 2012
New Revision: 192157
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192157
Log:
2012-10-06 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/45521
* interface.c (generic_correspondence): Implement additional
distinguishability criteria of F08.
(compare_actual_formal): Reject data object as actual argument for
procedure formal argument.
2012-10-06 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/45521
* gfortran.dg/generic_25.f90: New.
* gfortran.dg/generic_26.f90: New.
* gfortran.dg/generic_27.f90: New.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_25.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_26.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_27.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-06 12:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-06 12:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
14 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-06 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-06 12:35:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Fortran 2008's "12.4.3.4.5 Restrictions on generic declarations" has"
>
> "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if
> - one is a procedure and the other is a data object,
> - they are both data objects or known to be functions, and neither is TKR
> compatible with the other,
> - one has the ALLOCATABLE attribute and the other has the POINTER attribute, or
> - one is a function with nonzero rank and the other is not known to be a
> function."
r192157 implements item 3 and contains a bugfix for item 1, so that items 1-3
should be handled correctly.
About item 4 I'm not completely sure, but possibly we still miss that.
> Interpretation request F08/0001 / 10-145 changes this ("EDITS to 10-007")"
>
> '[286:4] In 12.4.3.4.5p3, after "the other has the POINTER attribute",
> Insert "and not the INTENT(IN) attribute".'
> Cf. http://j3-fortran.org/doc/meeting/193/10-199.txt
Unfortunately this was forgotten in the above commit. To do!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-06 12:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-45521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-02 22:39 ` [Bug fortran/45521] Fortran 2008: GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-18 19:19 ` [Bug fortran/45521] [F08] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-18 19:40 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 12:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 13:06 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 13:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-19 13:25 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
2012-04-19 13:37 ` wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail dot org
2012-04-19 13:39 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-20 12:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-20 12:59 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-25 12:30 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 12:20 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-06 12:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).