public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/45522]  New: VRP misses oppurtunity for statement folding.
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-45522-176@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

Hi,
compiling the attached testcase (reduced from tree.c) with -O2 leads to vrp
folding:
  if (D.2762_2 == 6)
    goto <bb 3>;
  else
    goto <bb 9>;

<bb 3>:
  D.2766_5 = (int) D.2762_2;
  D.2767_6 = tree_code_type[D.2766_5];

into
  D.2762_2 = type_1(D)->base.code;
  if (D.2762_2 == 6)
    goto <bb 3>;
  else
    goto <bb 9>;

<bb 3>:
  D.2766_5 = 6;
  D.2767_6 = tree_code_type[6];

this is good transform, however tree_code_type is constant initialized array
and we miss possibility to fold it into constant until expansion triggering
code in expr.c I would like to retire.

We can fold tree_code_type[6], so apparently just no one calls fold_gimple_stmt
on it?


-- 
           Summary: VRP misses oppurtunity for statement folding.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522


             reply	other threads:[~2010-09-03 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-03 15:58 hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2010-09-03 15:59 ` [Bug tree-optimization/45522] " hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-03 16:33 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-03 16:34 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-03 20:05 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-03 20:10 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-03 20:13 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-03 20:29 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-04  8:29 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-09-04 13:52 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-04 14:11 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-09-04 18:01 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-45522-176@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).