From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22322 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2013 17:58:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22029 invoked by uid 48); 8 Feb 2013 17:58:06 -0000 From: "earnie at users dot sourceforge.net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug driver/45749] Response file unwrapped between collect2.exe and ld.exe Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: driver X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: earnie at users dot sourceforge.net X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00848.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45749 Earnie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |earnie at users dot | |sourceforge.net --- Comment #11 from Earnie 2013-02-08 17:58:03 UTC --- So why is this doing the correct thing when supplying the --with-gnu-ld option versus the fact that we have GNU ld and the configure script discovers it? It seems to me the bug would be in the configure process.