public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
@ 2010-09-27 12:23 avg at icyb dot net.ua
2010-09-27 16:19 ` [Bug other/45808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: avg at icyb dot net.ua @ 2010-09-27 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
Summary: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: avg@icyb.net.ua
On recent (and maintained) versions of FreeBSD it is required that shared
libraries using pthread functions are linked to libpthread. This was not the
case in older and now unsupported versions of the OS.
So, currently GCC on FreeBSD expands -pthread option to -lpthread only when
target is a final binary. When compilation target is a shared library -pthread
is ignored.
This needs to be fixed in -pthread specifications for FreeBSD.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
@ 2010-09-27 16:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-09-28 13:39 ` avg at icyb dot net.ua
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-09-27 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-27 10:49:36 UTC ---
Patches should be posted to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
2010-09-27 16:19 ` [Bug other/45808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-09-28 13:39 ` avg at icyb dot net.ua
2010-09-28 14:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: avg at icyb dot net.ua @ 2010-09-28 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
--- Comment #3 from Andriy Gapon <avg at icyb dot net.ua> 2010-09-28 05:26:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Patches should be posted to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
And, in fact, I did that a (short?) while ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/217482/focus=217484
But it seems that nobody has picked it so far.
Perhaps I am the one to blame for that given the incorrect attachments.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
2010-09-27 16:19 ` [Bug other/45808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-09-28 13:39 ` avg at icyb dot net.ua
@ 2010-09-28 14:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-09-29 11:09 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-09-28 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-28 08:28:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Patches should be posted to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>
> And, in fact, I did that a (short?) while ago:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/217482/focus=217484
> But it seems that nobody has picked it so far.
> Perhaps I am the one to blame for that given the incorrect attachments.
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html
If you do not receive a response to a patch that you have submitted within two
weeks or so, it may be a good idea to chase it by sending a follow-up email to
the same list(s). Patches can occasionally fall through the cracks. Please be
sure to include a brief summary of the patch and the URL of the entry in the
mailing list archive of the original submission.
If you do not have write access and a patch of yours has been approved, but not
committed, please advise the approver of that fact. You may want to point out
lack of write access in your initial submission, too.
And point 6 here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-28 14:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-09-29 11:09 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
2011-02-14 0:46 ` [Bug target/45808] " gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gerald at pfeifer dot com @ 2010-09-29 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #5 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> 2010-09-29 02:55:47 UTC ---
I'm doing the necessary regression testing and will report the patch
with a proper ChangeLog entry later this week.
(I actually was the one encouraging Andriy to post the patch and file
a Bugzilla, just missed the latter.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-09-29 11:09 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
@ 2011-02-14 0:46 ` gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-25 23:19 ` gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gerald at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-14 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
--- Comment #6 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org <gerald at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-14 00:40:19 UTC ---
Author: gerald
Date: Mon Feb 14 00:40:15 2011
New Revision: 170121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170121
Log:
PR target/45808
* config/freebsd-spec.h (FBSD_LIB_SPEC): Handle the shared case.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-14 0:46 ` [Bug target/45808] " gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-25 23:19 ` gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-20 23:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-21 6:35 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gerald at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-25 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
--- Comment #7 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org <gerald at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-25 23:15:51 UTC ---
Author: gerald
Date: Fri Feb 25 23:15:48 2011
New Revision: 170505
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170505
Log:
PR target/45808
* config/freebsd-spec.h (FBSD_LIB_SPEC): Handle the shared case.
Update copyright years.
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/config/freebsd-spec.h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-25 23:19 ` gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-08-20 23:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-21 6:35 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-08-20 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Perhaps this should be closed?
>From gcc-bugs-return-458916-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 23:25:28 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458916-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7436 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 23:25:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7016 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2014 23:25:23 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/35376] #pragma GCC diagnostic expand function.
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-35376-4-zy8xbHn5io@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-35376-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-35376-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01413.txt.bz2
Content-length: 487
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35376
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|manu at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am not sure what this is about, but it is so old that we should probably
close it.
>From gcc-bugs-return-458917-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 23:35:29 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458917-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15009 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 23:35:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14965 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2014 23:35:24 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/52959] Missing typo suggestions
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:35:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-52959-4-2YQDffb7SF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-52959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-52959-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01414.txt.bz2
Content-length: 863
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52959
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-08-20
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I for one would love to have this (and PR52277) but I cannot commit the amount
of time/work needed to make this work.
Pretty please, could someone implement it? Marek, Paolo, Google guys?
>From gcc-bugs-return-458918-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 23:37:37 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458918-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16150 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 23:37:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16118 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2014 23:37:33 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58589] diagnostics: missing proper file:line on C++ compilation error
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-58589-4-5BZAsJa3hx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58589-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01415.txt.bz2
Content-length: 597
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58589
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2014-08-20
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Waiting for a minimized testcase.
>From gcc-bugs-return-458920-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 23:46:51 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458920-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19857 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 23:46:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19817 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2014 23:46:46 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/61405] Not emitting "enumeration value not handled in switch" warning for bit-field enums
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-61405-4-1vDkLJbHPb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61405-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61405-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01417.txt.bz2
Content-length: 533
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61405
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-08-20
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Seems confirmed enough.
>From gcc-bugs-return-458919-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 23:46:20 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458919-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19050 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 23:46:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18985 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2014 23:46:06 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/59098] Unwarranted warning: promoted ~unsigned is always non-zero [-Wsign-compare]
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-59098-4-8pjYutnvvP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59098-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59098-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01416.txt.bz2
Content-length: 536
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-08-20
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I think this is confirmed.
>From gcc-bugs-return-458921-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 23:50:20 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458921-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21903 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 23:50:20 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21841 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2014 23:50:16 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/44521] unhelpful candidates for ambiguous lookup
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:50:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-44521-4-iRoL9M3cpQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01418.txt.bz2
Content-length: 482
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44521
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Jason, do we want this?
Following Clang or in some other way?
>From gcc-bugs-return-458922-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Aug 20 23:51:39 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458922-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23059 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 23:51:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23011 invoked by uid 48); 20 Aug 2014 23:51:35 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/44786] -fsanitize=undefined: Turn on runtime code generation to check for undefined behavior
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:51:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-44786-4-5AsVB34Lus@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-44786-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-44786-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01419.txt.bz2
Content-length: 197
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So what is missing here? Can we close this or not yet?
>From gcc-bugs-return-458923-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Aug 21 00:02:49 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-458923-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3949 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2014 00:02:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3912 invoked by uid 48); 21 Aug 2014 00:02:46 -0000
From: "philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/47781] warnings from custom printf format specifiers
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.5
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-47781-4-yerR9nsEYG@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47781-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47781-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg01420.txt.bz2
Content-length: 914
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idG781
--- Comment #8 from Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@redfish-solutions.com> ---
(In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #4)
> For the general issue, my inclination is that we should add plugin hooks
> into the format checking machinery that allow plugins to define formats
> with the full flexibility of all the format checking datastructures in
> GCC. Using GCC plugins for this avoids problems with defining complicated
> syntax in the source file to describe the peculiarities of different
> formats, which might constrain future changes to the format checking
> implementation by making too much of the internals visible to user source
> code, because by design GCC plugins can use GCC internals which are free
> to change incompatibly in ways that require plugin changes.
What about using pragmas to describe the new format specifier?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/45808] FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-08-20 23:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-08-21 6:35 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: gerald at pfeifer dot com @ 2014-08-21 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45808
Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com> ---
Good point, since I had committed this for GCC 4.6 (and later) and
also GCC 4.5.
Closing as fixed. And thanks, Andriy!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-08-21 6:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-27 12:23 [Bug target/45808] New: FreeBSD: -pthread is handled incompletely avg at icyb dot net.ua
2010-09-27 16:19 ` [Bug other/45808] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-09-28 13:39 ` avg at icyb dot net.ua
2010-09-28 14:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-09-29 11:09 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
2011-02-14 0:46 ` [Bug target/45808] " gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-25 23:19 ` gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-20 23:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-08-21 6:35 ` gerald at pfeifer dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).