From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23886 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2010 19:18:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 23877 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Sep 2010 19:18:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:18:28 +0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/45824] New: Update expr.c's check_inquiry for C_SIZEOF, compiler_version/_options, etc. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:34:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg03042.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D45824 Summary: Update expr.c's check_inquiry for C_SIZEOF, compiler_version/_options, etc. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org CC: dfranke@gcc.gnu.org Follow up to PR 40568 - but also to PR 40569. The PR of the former - I might not have copied all remaining tasks. ISO_C_BINDING's C_SIZEOF but also ISO_FORTRAN_ENV's compiler_options/compiler_version as listed under Fortran 2008's "7.1.11 Sp= eci cation expression" as "speci=0Ccation inquiry". If I understood this part of the previous PR correctly, it means that expr.= c's check_inquiry needs to be updated. I think except for some F95 vs. newer checks, most items should be handled = via flags in add_function/subroutine of intrinsic.c as one easily forgets to up= date check_inquiry.