[Bug fortran/45836] New: Fortran 2003 - Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[Bug fortran/45836] New: Fortran 2003 - Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[ortp21 at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

           Summary: Fortran 2003 - Type Bound Procedure Error - Type
                    Mismatch
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: ortp21@gmail.com


The following error is produced by the example typeboundprocedure.f95, pasted
below:

Error
----------------------------------------------
typeboundprocedure.f95:46.12:

    print *, b_type_instance%sizeReturn()
            1
Error: Type mismatch in argument 'a_type_' at (1); passed TYPE(b_type) to
CLASS(a_type)
----------------------------------------------

I have tested the same example using the Intel Fortran Compiler 11.1 on Linux
and it compiles without error.

Compiled using:

gfortran -c typeboundprocedure.f95

typeboundprocedure.f95
----------------------------------------------
module A
implicit none
    type :: a_type
    private
        integer :: size = 1
    contains
        procedure :: sizeReturn
    end type a_type
    contains
        function sizeReturn( a_type_ )
            implicit none
            integer :: sizeReturn
            class(a_type) :: a_type_

            sizeReturn = a_type_%size
        end function sizeReturn
end module A

module B
implicit none
    type :: b_type
    private
        integer :: size = 2
    contains
        procedure :: sizeReturn
    end type b_type
    contains
        function sizeReturn( b_type_ )
            implicit none
            integer :: sizeReturn
            class(b_type) :: b_type_

            sizeReturn = b_type_%size
        end function sizeReturn
end module B

program main
use A
use B
implicit none
    type(a_type) :: a_type_instance
    type(b_type) :: b_type_instance

    print *, a_type_instance%sizeReturn()
    print *, b_type_instance%sizeReturn()
end program main
----------------------------------------------

Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.6-20100925/configure --prefix=~$HOME/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=fortran --enable-checking=release --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20100925 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/45836] [OOP] Fortran 2003 - Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[burnus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
                 CC|                            |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
            Summary|Fortran 2003 - Type Bound   |[OOP] Fortran 2003 - Type
                   |Procedure Error - Type      |Bound Procedure Error -
                   |Mismatch                    |Type Mismatch

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-29 16:17:30 UTC ---
The problem is that the name of the module procedure is the same for both TBP;
that's valid but seemingly does not work.

Variant A: Without use-associating the ambiguous "sizeReturn" the program
works:
   use A, only: a_type
   use B, only: b_type

Variant B: Only importing one of the "sizeReturn" also works:
   use A, only: a_type
   use B, only: b_type, sizeReturn
or
   use A, only: a_type
   use B

However, using just
   use A
   use B
or even
   use A, only: a_type, sizeReturn
   use B, only: b_type, sizeReturn
does not. (This use associates both "sizeReturn", which is valid as long as one
does use "sizeReturn"; if one would use the symbol, it's an error as the symbol
is ambiguous.)

[Bug fortran/45836] [OOP] Fortran 2003 - Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[ortp21 at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

--- Comment #2 from ortp21 at gmail dot com 2010-09-29 20:24:24 UTC ---
Tobias,

Thank you for the workaround variants. I have used them instead of what I was
trying to do, with success.

I hope the bug report was worthwhile/accurate.

[Bug fortran/45836] [OOP] Fortran 2003 - Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[janus at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2010.10.01 09:40:38
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

[Bug fortran/45836] [OOP] Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[mikael at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-06 15:50:23 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sun Jan  6 15:50:09 2013
New Revision: 194949

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194949
Log:
    PR fortran/42769
    PR fortran/45836
    PR fortran/45900
    * module.c (read_module): Don't reuse local symtree if the associated
    symbol isn't exactly the one wanted.  Don't reuse local symtree if it is
    ambiguous.
    * resolve.c (resolve_call): Use symtree's name instead of symbol's to
    lookup the symtree.

    PR fortran/42769
    PR fortran/45836
    PR fortran/45900
    * gfortran.dg/use_23.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_24.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_25.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_26.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_27.f90: New test.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_23.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_24.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_25.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_26.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_27.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/module.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug fortran/45836] [OOP] Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[mikael at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-08 19:42:49 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Tue Jan  8 19:42:38 2013
New Revision: 195031

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195031
Log:
    PR fortran/42769
    PR fortran/45836
    PR fortran/45900
    * module.c (read_module): Don't reuse local symtree if the associated
    symbol isn't exactly the one wanted.  Don't reuse local symtree if it is
    ambiguous.
    * resolve.c (resolve_call): Use symtree's name instead of symbol's to
    lookup the symtree.

    PR fortran/42769
    PR fortran/45836
    PR fortran/45900
    * gfortran.dg/use_23.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_24.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_25.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_26.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_27.f90: New test.


Added:
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_23.f90
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_24.f90
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_25.f90
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_26.f90
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_27.f90
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/fortran/module.c
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug fortran/45836] [OOP] Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[mikael at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-08 20:02:01 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Tue Jan  8 20:01:49 2013
New Revision: 195032

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195032
Log:
    PR fortran/42769
    PR fortran/45836
    PR fortran/45900
    * module.c (read_module): Don't reuse local symtree if the associated
    symbol isn't exactly the one wanted.  Don't reuse local symtree if it is
    ambiguous.
    * resolve.c (resolve_call): Use symtree's name instead of symbol's to
    lookup the symtree.

    PR fortran/42769
    PR fortran/45836
    PR fortran/45900
    * gfortran.dg/use_23.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_24.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_25.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_26.f90: New test.
    * gfortran.dg/use_27.f90: New test.


Added:
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_23.f90
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_24.f90
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_25.f90
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_26.f90
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/use_27.f90
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/fortran/module.c
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug fortran/45836] [OOP] Type Bound Procedure Error - Type Mismatch

[mikael at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45836

Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.4

--- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-01-09 14:31:53 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.6.4  4.7.3  4.8.0.
Thanks for the bug report.