public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
@ 2010-10-01  6:19 JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
  2010-10-01  7:24 ` [Bug c++/45853] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com @ 2010-10-01  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853

           Summary: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer
                    lists
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: JamesMikeDuPont@googlemail.com


Created attachment 21928
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21928
Compile Log

I have been experimenting with c++ initializer lists and refactoring binutils
to use c++. While doing so, the compiler crashed. I am reporting this in case
it might help the development of the compiler.

Compiler is :
g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu9) 4.4.1

lsb version : 9.10 karmic with lots of backports and patches


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
  2010-10-01  6:19 [Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
@ 2010-10-01  7:24 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-16 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-01  7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-01 07:24:14 UTC ---
If you're testing features marked "experimental" then please use a current
release or search existing bug reports, this doesn't seem to crash with 4.4.4
or later


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
  2010-10-01  6:19 [Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
  2010-10-01  7:24 ` [Bug c++/45853] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-16 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-16 20:51 ` JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-16 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.05.16 11:00:14
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-16 11:00:14 UTC ---
please try to reproduce this with a current FSF release or report it to Ubuntu

for C++0x bugs please try 4.5 or later, lots of initializer list bugs have been
fixed already


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
  2010-10-01  6:19 [Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
  2010-10-01  7:24 ` [Bug c++/45853] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-16 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-16 20:51 ` JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
  2011-05-17 11:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-09-23 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com @ 2011-05-16 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853

--- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont <JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com> 2011-05-16 19:17:06 UTC ---
Ok,
I will have to look into it,
thanks,
mike

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:19 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853
>
> Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
>           What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
>   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.05.16 11:00:14
>     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
>
> --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-16 11:00:14 UTC ---
> please try to reproduce this with a current FSF release or report it to Ubuntu
>
> for C++0x bugs please try 4.5 or later, lots of initializer list bugs have been
> fixed already
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug.
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
  2010-10-01  6:19 [Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-16 20:51 ` JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
@ 2011-05-17 11:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-09-23 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-17 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |4.4.5, 4.5.2, 4.6.0

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-17 11:33:03 UTC ---
No ICE on i686-pc-linux-gnu with:

gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8) 
gcc version 4.4.5 (GCC) 
gcc version 4.5.2 (GCC) 
gcc version 4.6.0 (GCC)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists
  2010-10-01  6:19 [Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-17 11:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-09-23 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-09-23 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-23 12:26:37 UTC ---
Let's close this.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-23 12:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-01  6:19 [Bug c++/45853] New: Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
2010-10-01  7:24 ` [Bug c++/45853] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-16 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-16 20:51 ` JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com
2011-05-17 11:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-23 12:31 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).