From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1005 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2010 12:25:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 992 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Dec 2010 12:25:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_QN X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:25:25 +0000 From: "rmansfield at qnx dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/45885] ICE in arm_dbx_register_number, at config/arm/arm.c:22071 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rmansfield at qnx dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:25:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885 --- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield 2010-12-03 12:25:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > As I've said in the past, the arm-none-linux-gnu target really hasn't been > validated for neon support and thus it is likely that there are parts which are > just broken. Thus expecting that this will *work* is probably not correct. > > This configuration is strictly in maintenance mode only and I would encourage > you to move on to linux-gnueabi . This bug, as are the other ones I filed are not strictly limited to arm-none-linux-gnu. I am simply using a using arm-none-linux-gnu toolchain to reproduce and report the issue. These likely effect all apcs-gnu toolchains, and looking at config.gcc, there are more configurations that follow that than gnueabi configurations. So basically you're saying that NEON is only supported in arm-none-linux-gnueabi configurations because it's only been tested there. As for the expecting it to work, ICE are always bugs so until support for these configurations are removed these are valid bugs. Whether bugs get closed, as fixed or wontfix, doesn't make them less of a bug.