From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-335696-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5825 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2010 20:55:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 5815 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Nov 2010 20:55:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:55:51 +0000
From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-45923-4-ViVi1rlTJU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-45923-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45923-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 20:55:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00429.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D45923

--- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-03 20=
:55:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 22268
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D22268
constexpr diagnostics test case #04


This is just a test case for previously-reported-and fixed bug. Let's keep =
it
around to avoid regressions.

%$bin/H-x86_64-gcc-trunk/bin/g++ -c -std=3Dgnu++0x
constexpr-diagnostics-initalizer1.cc
constexpr-diagnostics-initalizer1.cc: In function =E2=80=98int main()=E2=80=
=99:
constexpr-diagnostics-initalizer1.cc:21:21:   in constexpr expansion of =E2=
=80=98A((* &
a1))=E2=80=99
constexpr-diagnostics-initalizer1.cc:21:21: error: the value of =E2=80=98a1=
=E2=80=99 is not
usable in a constant expression
constexpr-diagnostics-initalizer1.cc:20:13: note: =E2=80=98a1=E2=80=99 was =
not declared
=E2=80=98constexpr=E2=80=99


What we really need is the last line, the note: 'a1' was not declared const=
expr