From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-338130-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 30958 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2010 15:12:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 30864 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2010 15:12:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:12:05 +0000
From: "patrick.marlier at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: trans-mem
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: patrick.marlier at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-45940-4-Cqr2saq8ag@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-45940-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45940-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:29:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg02863.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940

Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |patrick.marlier at gmail
                   |                            |dot com

--- Comment #4 from Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier at gmail dot com> 2010-11-23 15:11:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> push_back() is not annotated as transaction_pure.

True. It was just a annotation test and thus others functions are not
annotated. So it seems correct.

> Please verify that this is the case on your end, because my upcoming patch will
> only fix the error in the PR, not this additional error I see.

I think it is ok. Did you send the patch in gcc-patches?

Patrick Marlier.