From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-349772-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21787 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2011 04:42:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 21775 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Mar 2011 04:42:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:42:28 +0000
From: "hp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-45962-4-PIvFW6tzWH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-45962-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45962-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:42:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg01085.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #19 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 04:42:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> > To be investigated; I'll do my part.

Famous last words... well, it didn't happen yet, but something else happened:

This bug was either fixed or re-covered in the range 170660..170665 and I'd be
very surprised if it wasn't your 170663.  Tracking down the related mailing
list conversations (with DJ regarding m32r) it was apparently a fix intended
for exactly this problem, so thanks. :]  Yay, no regressions since T0.

Did I mention I tried at the previous iteration setting EXIT_IGNORE_STACK to 1
and got massive regressions?  Ripe for a revisit.  Just not now.

As an intended fix was committed, I'm closing this PR.