public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug objc/45989] Some objc.dg-struct-layout-encoding-1 tests XPASS
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 19:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-45989-4-to2BXWhxOV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-45989-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989

--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-01-07 19:16:42 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-01-05 22:31:14 UTC ---
>> * We should use i?86*-*-* (or perhaps just i?86-*-*, I see no reason for the
>> first *).
>
> I don't think this cover x86_64-*-*, this is why I have tested *86*-*-*

Indeed, had forgotten about that. In that case, we should do as
everywhere else in the testsuite and explicitly list i?86-*-* and
x86_64-*-*.  Just *86*-*-* is too general (there was a sparcle86 or
something, I think :-).

>> * The comment should be updated (perhaps with PR #s) to provide documentation
>>   for the XFAILed changes.
>
> See the end of comment #2. This should probably addressed by the objc
> maintainers.

Probably, and hopefully the will do so once we finally propose the patch
and get approval.

With the exception of x86_64 handling above, we're good to go, I think.

    Rainer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-07 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-12 18:11 [Bug objc/45989] New: " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-23 10:01 ` [Bug objc/45989] " nicola at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-21 18:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2010-12-22 15:47 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-05 14:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-05 19:17 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-05 19:31 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-05 22:51 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-07 19:39 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE [this message]
2011-01-09 12:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-14 17:37 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-14 18:55 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-14 19:05 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-45989-4-to2BXWhxOV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).