From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-336518-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12942 invoked by alias); 10 Nov 2010 10:26:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 12930 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Nov 2010 10:26:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:26:30 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46221-4-X73t3BwBvi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg01251.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221

--- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2010-11-10 10:25:51 UTC ---
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221
> 
> Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |howarth at nitro dot
>                    |                            |med.uc.edu
> 
> --- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2010-11-10 05:12:10 UTC ---
> The new gcc.target/i386/alias-1.c testcase produces...
> 
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/alias-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/alias-1.c scan-assembler wobbly
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/alias-1.c scan-assembler jelly
> 
> at -m32 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with errors of the form...
> 
> Executing on host: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/xgcc
> -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/gcc/
> /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20101109/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/alias-1.c
>    -ansi -pedantic-errors -S  -m32 -o alias-1.s    (timeout = 300)
> /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/gcc-4.6-20101109/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/alias-1.c:6:1:
> warning: alias definitions not supported in Mach-O; ignored [enabled by
> default]^M
> 
> Shouldn't this testcase contain...
> 
> /* { dg-require-alias "" } */
> 
> which will convert it to an unsupported test as was done for
> gcc.dg/lto/20081222_0.c on darwin?

Feel free to do it, I tend to forget such details.