public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/46223] New: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu
@ 2010-10-29 12:24 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-07 13:04 ` [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-10-29 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223

           Summary: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on
                    s390-ibm-linux-gnu
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
              Host: s390-ibm-linux-gnu
            Target: s390-ibm-linux-gnu


On s390-ibm-linux-gnu the infamous bessel_7 test fails. One probably needs to
update the epsilons a bit - but I have not really though about the correct
values - hence this bugreport.


> gfortran bessel_7 failure (was: Re: Results for 4.6.0 20101021
> (experimental) (GCC) testsuite on s390-ibm-linux-gnu)
> > > LAST_UPDATED: Thu Oct 21 06:07:02 UTC 2010 (revision 165748M)
> > > Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
> > >       === gfortran tests ===
> > >
> > > Running target unix
> > > FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90  -O0  execution test

The only failing test is:

[...]
 YN for X =    34.529999      -- Epsilon =   1.19209290E-07
[...]
26 -0.174342096E-01 -0.174342729E-01    0.63E-07-30.4717006683  T  F

Thanks to Andreas Krebbel for running the test.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu
  2010-10-29 12:24 [Bug fortran/46223] New: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-07 13:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-10 17:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-07 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P4
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0
            Summary|gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90    |[4.6 Regression]
                   |failures on                 |gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90
                   |s390-ibm-linux-gnu          |failures on
                   |                            |s390-ibm-linux-gnu

--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-07 13:03:50 UTC ---
Mark as regression to keep in on my radar. The test case is new thus one can
argue whether it is a regression or not.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu
  2010-10-29 12:24 [Bug fortran/46223] New: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-07 13:04 ` [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-10 17:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-10 17:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 15:12 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-10 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-10 17:41:31 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 10 17:41:22 2010
New Revision: 166546

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166546
Log:
2010-11-10  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/46223
        * gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90: Bump allowed precision to avoid
        failure on s390.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu
  2010-10-29 12:24 [Bug fortran/46223] New: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-07 13:04 ` [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-10 17:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-10 17:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 15:12 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-10 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-10 17:42:54 UTC ---
Fixed - hopefully.

The PR can be closed if a "4.6.0 (experimental)" build for s390 does no longer
has a failing bessel_7.f90.

Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/current


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu
  2010-10-29 12:24 [Bug fortran/46223] New: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-10 17:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-15 15:12 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-15 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46223

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 14:57:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The PR can be closed if a "4.6.0 (experimental)" build for s390 does no longer
> has a failing bessel_7.f90.

FIXED: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-11/msg01211.html

Failing is only gfortran.dg/allocatable_scalar_5.f90, which is PR 46485.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-15 15:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-29 12:24 [Bug fortran/46223] New: gfortran.dg/bessel_7.f90 failures on s390-ibm-linux-gnu burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 13:04 ` [Bug fortran/46223] [4.6 Regression] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-10 17:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-10 17:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 15:12 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).