From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13688 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2010 17:40:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 13629 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2010 17:40:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:40:15 +0000 From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/46232] [4.6 regression] 64-bit gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr14814.c FAILs on SPARC X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:40:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01793.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor 2010-12-15 17:40:00 UTC --- I see. I think this is not a P1 stuff then and should definitely not block a release. I'd rather not promise anything, but I'll add this to my TODO list and hope I will try to address this for 4.7. As far as the MEM_REF instead of ARRAY_REF awkwardness is concerned, I don't feel like discussing merits of the former here but trust me there are reasons for this. If you want to have a look for yourself, compare 4.5 and 4.6 build_ref_for_offset implementations (including build_ref_for_model in 4.6) and especially their callers (and the number of them). And of course there was PR 44972.