From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3144 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2011 05:43:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 3135 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jun 2011 05:43:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:43:27 +0000 From: "eric.weddington at atmel dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the -mint8 option X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: eric.weddington at atmel dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:43:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02275.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 --- Comment #10 from Eric Weddington 2011-06-27 05:43:20 UTC --- Hi All, Johann is correct in his comment to bug #46261 (below). The -mint8 compiler switch is now causing the compiler to give an ICE. We need to finally make a decision from one of these options: 1. Fix ICE, leave -mint8 in the compiler, don't do anything with avr-libc, even though avr-libc doesn't build with it. 2. Fix ICE, leave -mint8 in the compiler, work on avr-libc to also build with -mint8 (eventually). 3. Remove -mint8, because avr-libc will never be changed to work with it. Or suggest an alternative option. Personally, I vote for #3. What's your option? Thanks, Eric Weddington > -----Original Message----- > From: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 1:42 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Subject: [Bug target/46261] avr-gcc: Segfaults when compiled with the - > mint8 option > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46261 > > Georg-Johann Lay changed: > > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code > Status|RESOLVED |NEW > Last reconfirmed| |2011.06.26 19:41:11 > Resolution|WONTFIX | > Ever Confirmed|0 |1 > Known to fail| |4.5.2, 4.6.1 > > --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-26 > 19:41:11 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #1) > > The -mint8 option also does not work with building avr-libc. There has > been > > discussion (on the avr-gcc-list mailing list) about eventually removing > this. > > There has been no interest by the AVR port maintainers (that I'm aware > of) in > > continuing to maintain this switch. > > > > Closed as WONTFIX. > > I strongly oppose the WON'T FIX. > > Either we keep that option and is is functional. > Or we keep it and say sorry("-mint8 is discontinued") when it is used. > Or we remove it. > > By no means the compiler is supposet to run into ICE/segfault, so allow me > to > reopen this issue. > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug.