From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-336812-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16619 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2010 22:32:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 16572 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Nov 2010 22:32:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:32:52 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/46325] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/char_initialiser_actual.f90 FAILs with -fstack-protector
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46325-4-IvWu4prPSx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:32:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg01545.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46325

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-11 22:32:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, the actual argument associated with pfoo here is not x but
> (/"is Ja","ne Fo","nda  "/)

Well, the effective argument nevertheless does not have the TARGET attribute.
Thus I believe the same argument applies and the test case is invalid.

>  y => <undefined pointer>

Actually, already that line is invalid (per 7.1.9.2).

> but if the same thing applies to it too, then the
> gfortran.dg/char_initialiser_actual.f90 testcase is invalid too and thus should
> be nuked.

Well, not nuked but modified:

@@ -26,3 +26,4 @@ contains
      character*5, dimension(:), pointer :: pfoo
-     pfoo => ch2
+     allocate(pfoo(size(ch2)))
+     pfoo = ch2
   end function pfoo