From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29692 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2010 15:30:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 29675 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Nov 2010 15:30:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:30:40 +0000 From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/46331] New: Compilation time long with simple function in array constructor X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:30:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00742.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46331 Summary: Compilation time long with simple function in array constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org program foo implicit none Integer :: i Integer, Parameter :: N = 10**4 Real, Dimension(N) :: xs ! Random points xs = (/ (rand(0), i=1,N) /) print *, xs end program The time spent in the FE is not bad, but the resulting translation is horrible and it wreaks havoc with the middle end and down the road. I think we should not expand this constructor at all, especially since 'i' is not used in the function expression. However, rand(0) needs to be called once for each element. That means it needs to be translated into: do i-1,N xs = rand(0) end do In otherwords, I think another special case in gfc_trans_assignment. There are other special cases already there.