public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
@ 2010-11-07 19:44 ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/46349] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-07 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Summary: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org
The fix for PR tree-opt/44972 has introduced regressions in Ada, specifically:
(sra_modify_assign): Removed ref_expr_for_all_replacements_p checks,
checks for return values of build_ref_for_offset.
sra_modify_assign now builds addresses of non-byte-aligned references, leading
to the expected ICE later in the RTL expander:
eric@atlantis:~/build/gcc/native32> gcc/xgcc -Bgcc -S opt9.adb -gnatws -O
+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.6.0 20101105 (experimental) [trunk revision 166350] (i586-suse-linux-gnu)
GCC error:|
| in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7009 |
| Error detected around opt9.adb:17:7
The non-byte-aligned reference is a bitfield with aggregate type. I think that
the checks of the return values should be reinstated somehow or other.
The testcase is suitable for addition to the gnat.dg testsuite.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/46349] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-07 19:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-09 8:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-07 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-07 19:46:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 22311
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22311
Testcase, file #2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-07 19:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-07 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-07 19:45:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 22310
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22310
Testcase, file #1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/46349] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-09 8:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-09 14:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-09 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-09 8:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-09 14:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-10 12:24 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-09 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-09 14:33:25 UTC ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-09 14:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-10 12:24 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-10 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-10 12:24:05 UTC ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01013.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-10 12:24 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-15 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 16:39 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 16:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-15 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-15 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-15 16:39 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 16:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-15 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 16:32:23 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Nov 15 16:32:18 2010
New Revision: 166759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166759
Log:
2010-11-15 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR tree-optimization/46349
* tree-sra.c (contains_bitfld_comp_ref_p): New function.
(contains_vce_or_bfcref_p): Likewise.
(sra_modify_assign): Use them.
* testsuite/gnat.dg/opt9.adb: New file.
* testsuite/gnat.dg/opt9_pkg.ads: Likewise
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/opt9.adb
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/opt9_pkg.ads
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-sra.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/46349] [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-15 16:39 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-15 16:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-15 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46349
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 16:36:52 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-15 16:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-07 19:44 [Bug tree-optimization/46349] New: [4.6 regression] incorrect scalarization ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/46349] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-07 19:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-09 8:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-09 14:33 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-10 12:24 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 16:39 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 16:49 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).