public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/46425] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures
@ 2010-11-11 4:12 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 4:13 ` [Bug testsuite/46425] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-11-11 4:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
CC: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org
On Linux/x86-64, revision 166570:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-11/msg00459.html
caused:
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield2.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield2.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield4.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield4.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/bitfield4.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/other/i386-2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/other/i386-2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/other/i386-3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/other/i386-3.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-15.c (test for warnings, line 11)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-15.c (test for warnings, line 11)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-15.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-17.c (test for warnings, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-17.c (test for warnings, line 10)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-17.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/bitfld-17.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c (test for warnings, line 33)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39545-1.c (test for warnings, line 20)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39545-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39545-2.c (test for warnings, line 14)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39545-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39678.c (test for warnings, line 13)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39678.c (test for excess errors)
One error looks like
Executing on host: /export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/bld/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/bld/gcc/
/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c
-O2 -S -o pr39082-1.s (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/bld/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/bld/gcc/
/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c -O2
-S -o pr39082-1.s^M
/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c: In
function 'foo3':^M
/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c:33:12:
note: the ABI of passing union with long double has changed in GCC 4.4^M
output is:
/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c: In
function 'foo3':^M
/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c:33:12:
note: the ABI of passing union with long double has changed in GCC 4.4^M
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c (test for warnings, line 33)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/export/gnu/import/rrs/166570/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr39082-1.c:33:12:
note: the ABI of passing union with long double has changed in GCC 4.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/46425] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures
2010-11-11 4:12 [Bug c/46425] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-11-11 4:13 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 4:41 ` Andrew Pinski
2010-11-11 4:41 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-11-11 4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2010.11.11 04:13:10
Component|c |testsuite
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug testsuite/46425] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures
2010-11-11 4:13 ` [Bug testsuite/46425] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-11-11 4:41 ` Andrew Pinski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2010-11-11 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hjl.tools at gmail dot com; +Cc: gcc-bugs
These failures have fixed already. The issue was in the testsuite.
On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:13 PM, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
>
> H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ---
> ---
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
> Last reconfirmed| |2010.11.11 04:13:10
> Component|c |testsuite
> Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
> Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/46425] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures
2010-11-11 4:12 [Bug c/46425] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 4:13 ` [Bug testsuite/46425] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-11-11 4:41 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gmail dot com @ 2010-11-11 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com <pinskia at gmail dot com> 2010-11-11 04:41:09 UTC ---
These failures have fixed already. The issue was in the testsuite.
On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:13 PM, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
>
> H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ---
> ---
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
> Last reconfirmed| |2010.11.11 04:13:10
> Component|c |testsuite
> Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
> Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/46425] [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures
2010-11-11 4:12 [Bug c/46425] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 4:13 ` [Bug testsuite/46425] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 4:41 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
@ 2010-11-11 9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-11 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-11 09:24:12 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-11 9:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-11 4:12 [Bug c/46425] New: [4.6 Regression] Revision 166570 caused many failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 4:13 ` [Bug testsuite/46425] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 4:41 ` Andrew Pinski
2010-11-11 4:41 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
2010-11-11 9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).