public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-15 14:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 14:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-15 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 14:26:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455#c10
ok, that one showed up, 10 minutes late:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg01909.html

but the other one still didn't


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
@ 2010-11-15 14:35 redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 14:30 ` [Bug web/46482] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-15 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

           Summary: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: web
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: redi@gcc.gnu.org
                CC: LpSolit@netscape.net


No email was sent to gcc-bugs for these PR updates:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424#c4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455#c10

In both cases I changed the bug Status field.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 14:30 ` [Bug web/46482] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-15 14:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 18:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-15 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-15 14:39:14 UTC ---
and the emails for this bug arrived out of order:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg01913.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg01915.html

a problem with emails on sourceware.org ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 14:30 ` [Bug web/46482] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-15 14:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-15 18:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
  2010-11-29 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2010-11-15 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> 2010-11-15 18:50:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> a problem with emails on sourceware.org ?

No idea. You would have to ask fche, I think.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-15 18:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2010-11-29 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-29 11:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-29 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-29 11:06:39 UTC ---
bugzilla did not sending out emails for some new bugs until someone
replies to them. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg03512.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg03492.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg03488.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg03493.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-11/msg03486.html
all those emails say "New: " but also contain comment #1 as well as the
original bug


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-29 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-29 11:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-29 11:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-29 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-29 11:08:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> bugzilla did not sending out emails for some new bugs until someone
> replies to them.

Should read "Bugzilla *is* not sending out ..."


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-29 11:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-29 11:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-12 22:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-29 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-29 11:12:09 UTC ---
For PR 46669 THREE DAYS passed without an email being sent for the initial bug,
then finally a "New:" email was sent when Paolo responded to it.

If bugs are not sent to the gcc-bugs list then they will be missed and will go
unanswered until/unless someone searches for unconfirmed bugs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-29 11:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-12 22:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
  2011-05-12 22:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2011-05-12 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> 2011-05-12 21:59:43 UTC ---
Is it still happening these days? Or can this bug be closed?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-12 22:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2011-05-12 22:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-05-15 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-12 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-12 22:21:30 UTC ---
I pointed out some delays of up to an hour at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00138.html

I haven't seen any failing to arrive entirely, but I only monitor c++ bugs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-12 22:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-15 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-08-10  9:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
  2011-08-10 10:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-15 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-15 10:06:18 UTC ---
my mails to the gcc, libstdc++, gcc-help and gcc-patches lists show up in the
archives almost immediately, so the delays seem to be specific to mails to
gcc-bugs generated by bugzilla


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-05-15 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-10  9:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
  2011-08-10 10:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: LpSolit at netscape dot net @ 2011-08-10  9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #10 from Frédéric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> 2011-08-10 09:45:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> my mails to the gcc, libstdc++, gcc-help and gcc-patches lists show up in the
> archives almost immediately, so the delays seem to be specific to mails to
> gcc-bugs generated by bugzilla

I just made a few changes to some bugs a few minutes ago, and gcc-bugs already
got them. Looks like this was a temporary problem.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug web/46482] [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs
  2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-08-10  9:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
@ 2011-08-10 10:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-10 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46482

--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-10 10:13:12 UTC ---
The problem comes and goes, but does seem better recently.  I'll keep an eye on
it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-10 10:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-15 14:35 [Bug web/46482] New: [bugzilla] emails not sent to gcc-bugs redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 14:30 ` [Bug web/46482] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 14:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-15 18:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2010-11-29 11:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-29 11:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-29 11:46 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-12 22:18 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2011-05-12 22:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-15 10:33 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-10  9:46 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2011-08-10 10:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).