From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18469 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2010 10:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 18459 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2010 10:15:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:15:42 +0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled at -O3 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: major X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.5.2 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:57:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg03652.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 --- Comment #30 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30 10:15:02 UTC --- >>From a quick look I can see that with -fstrict-aliasing we will never consider ptr->link.next to alias ptr->list.next (so if they are made to alias via casting the testcase is invalid). Which I can see here: brigade_move(apr_bucket_brigade *b, apr_bucket_brigade *a, apr_bucket *e) { apr_bucket *f; if (e != (struct apr_bucket *)((char *)(&(&(b)->list)->next) - ((long) (((char *) (&(((struct apr_bucket*)0)->link))) - ((char *) 0))))) (struct apr_bucket *)((char *)(&(&(b)->list)->next) does exactly this (would be nice to rewrite the testcase to use offsetof btw).