From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-338311-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2713 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2010 21:51:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 2704 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2010 21:51:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 21:51:03 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46528-4-IRH2lbJun5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46528-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:04:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg03044.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528

--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-24 21:50:55 UTC ---
The CFGs match, the spanning tree as well.  Instrumenting needs to split
two edges, but that shouldn't matter and happens elsewhere as well.

But we have in .optimized (of the -fprofile-generate case)

<bb 11>:
  pretmp.676_490 = (unsigned int) D.8874_415;
  pretmp.677_491 = macro_39->params;
  pretmp.681_496 = *.LPBX1[67];

<bb 12>:
  # len_429 = PHI <len_55(12), len_44(11)>
  # ivtmp.698_171 = PHI <ivtmp.698_92(12), 0(11)>
  D.8871_52 = MEM[base: pretmp.677_491, index: ivtmp.698_171, step: 8, offset:
0B];
  D.8872_53 = D.8871_52->ident.len;
  D.8873_54 = D.8872_53 + 1;
  len_55 = D.8873_54 + len_429;
  # DEBUG len => len_55
  # DEBUG i => D#11
  # DEBUG len => len_55
  # DEBUG i => D#11
  ivtmp.698_92 = ivtmp.698_171 + 1;
  i_64 = (unsigned int) ivtmp.698_92;
  if (i_64 < pretmp.676_490)
    goto <bb 12>;
  else
    goto <bb 13>;

<bb 13>:
  D.11695_474 = pretmp.681_496 + 1;
  D.11697_493 = pretmp.676_490 + 4294967295;
  D.11698_127 = (long int) D.11697_493;
  *.LPBX1_I_lsm.686_486 = D.11695_474 + D.11698_127;
  *.LPBX1[67] = *.LPBX1_I_lsm.686_486;

which at least looks odd to me and produced by SCCP (supposedly
*.LPBX1[67] + 1 + (long)(niter - 1), so not 100% invalid).

Soooo ... for those who can reproduce it, can you try with
-fno-tree-scev-cprop?

I'll wrap my brain around that above computation tomorrow ;)