public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
@ 2010-11-24 20:10 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-24 20:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/46645] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-11-24 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation
/explicit_instantiation.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
CC: bkoz@redhat.com
On Linux/ia32, revision 167121 gave
FAIL:
20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
(test for excess errors)
Revision 167110 is OK. It may be caused by revision 167118:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-11/msg01007.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-11-24 20:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 20:47 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-24 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-24 20:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/46645] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-24 20:47 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 22:13 ` [Bug c++/46645] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-24 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |---
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-24 20:12:03 UTC ---
Hey HJ, thanks for the feedback.
I am unable to reproduce this on x86_64 by using -m32. Can you paste in the
excess errors from libstdc++.log for just this test? Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-24 20:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/46645] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 20:47 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-24 22:13 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-26 3:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-11-24 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at redhat dot com
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2010-11-24 22:06:09 UTC ---
Looks like a FE bug:
/net/gnu-13/export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc:23:21:
instantiated from here^M
/export/build/gnu/gcc/build-i686-linux/i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/tuple:71:22:
internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at
cp/semantics.c:5490^M
Please submit a full bug report,^M
with preprocessed source if appropriate.^M
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.^M
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-24 22:13 ` [Bug c++/46645] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-11-26 3:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-26 4:25 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-26 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2010.11.26 01:28:50
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-26 01:28:50 UTC ---
Also seen with r167135 on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-26 3:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-26 4:25 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
2010-12-01 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: zsojka at seznam dot cz @ 2010-11-26 4:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> 2010-11-26 01:41:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 22535
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22535
invalid autoreduced testcase
Reproduced at x86_86-linux, r167127 and r167147. Attached is autoreduced
testcase - it is invalid, but maybe better than nothing. I don't have any
revision available that would accept the original source without crashing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-11-26 4:25 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
@ 2010-12-01 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-01 16:17 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-01 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-01 11:12:51 UTC ---
Also seen on i386-pc-solaris2*, sparc-sun-solaris2* and mips-sgi-irix6.5 (all
ABIs).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-01 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-01 16:17 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2010-12-02 19:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-03 18:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: marc.glisse at normalesup dot org @ 2010-12-01 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |marc.glisse at normalesup
| |dot org
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse <marc.glisse at normalesup dot org> 2010-12-01 16:16:46 UTC ---
I get the same ICE (same line number 5490) with:
template<class _T1, class _T2> struct pair {
_T2 second;
template<class _U1, class _U2> constexpr pair(const pair<_U1, _U2>&
__p) : second(__p.second) { }
};
pair<int,int> make_pair();
struct Gmpfr{
Gmpfr(int);
};
struct Gmpfi{
Gmpfi(pair<const Gmpfr,const Gmpfr> bounds){ }
};
template <class CT> void test_interval_io(CT x){
Gmpfi a(x);
}
int main(){
test_interval_io<pair<int,Gmpfr> > (make_pair());
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-01 16:17 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
@ 2010-12-02 19:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-03 18:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-02 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-02 19:06:38 UTC ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-02 19:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-03 18:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-03 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-03 18:45:15 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-03 18:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-24 20:10 [Bug libstdc++/46645] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-24 20:45 ` [Bug libstdc++/46645] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 20:47 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 22:13 ` [Bug c++/46645] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2010-11-26 3:03 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-26 4:25 ` zsojka at seznam dot cz
2010-12-01 11:13 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-01 16:17 ` marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
2010-12-02 19:07 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-03 18:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).